Trial reportMolecular imaging and biology2014
Methodological considerations in quantification of 3'-deoxy-3'-[18F]fluorothymidine uptake measured with positron emission tomography in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
Trial report in Molecular imaging and biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interobserver reproducibility of tumor uptake quantification withEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019Article
- Applications of PET imaging with the proliferation marker [18F]-FLT.The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of... · 2015Review
- Metabolically active tumour volume segmentation from dynamic [(18)F]FLT PET studies in non-small cell lung cancer.EJNMMI research · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the effect of image-derived input functions (IDIF), input function corrections and volume of interest (VOI) size in quantification of [(18)F]FLT uptake in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. PROCEDURES: Twenty-three NSCLC patients were scanned on a HR+ scanner. IDIFs were defined over the aorta and left ventricle. Activity concentration and metabolite fraction were measured in venous blood samples. Venous blood samples at 30, 40 and 60 min after injection were used to calibrate the IDIF time-activity curves. Adaptive thresholds were used for VOI definition. Full kinetic analysis and simplified measures were performed.
resultsNon-linear regression analysis showed better fits for the irreversible model compared to the reversible model in the majority. Calibrated and metabolite corrected plus plasma-to-blood ratio corrected input function resulted in high correlations between SUV and Patlak K i (Pearson correlation coefficients 0.86-0.96, p value < 0.001). No significant differences in correlation between SUV and Patlak K i were observed with variation of IDIF structure or VOI size.
conclusionsPlasma-to-blood ratio correction, metabolite correction and calibration improved the correlation between SUV and Patlak K i significantly, indicating the need for these corrections when K i is used to validate semi-quantitative measures, such as SUV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23813332What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.