Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23813010›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2013

Learning subgroup-specific regulatory interactions and regulator independence with PARADIGM.

Andrew J Sedgewick, Stephen C Benz, Shahrooz Rabizadeh, Patrick Soon-Shiong, Charles J Vaske

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. ReactomeGSA - Efficient Multi-Omics Comparative Pathway Analysis.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Sharing information to reconstruct patient-specific pathways in heterogeneous diseases.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew J SedgewickJoint Carnegie Mellon - University of Pittsburgh Ph.D Program in Computational Biology, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
Stephen C Benz
Shahrooz Rabizadeh
Patrick Soon-Shiong
Charles J Vaske
University of California, Santa Cruz · USCarnegie Mellon University · US

Funding

Integrated Interdisciplinary, inter-university PhD Program Computational Biology (T32)T32EB009403 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BAHAR, IVET, BAR-JOSEPH, ZIV · 2009 to 2023
$4.4M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB009403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledHigh-dimensional '-omics' profiling provides a detailed molecular view of individual cancers; however, understanding the mechanisms by which tumors evade cellular defenses requires deep knowledge of the underlying cellular pathways within each cancer sample. We extended the PARADIGM algorithm (Vaske et al., 2010, Bioinformatics, 26, i237-i245), a pathway analysis method for combining multiple '-omics' data types, to learn the strength and direction of 9139 gene and protein interactions curated from the literature. Using genomic and mRNA expression data from 1936 samples in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort, we learned interactions that provided support for and relative strength of 7138 (78%) of the curated links. Gene set enrichment found that genes involved in the strongest interactions were significantly enriched for transcriptional regulation, apoptosis, cell cycle regulation and response to tumor cells. Within the TCGA breast cancer cohort, we assessed different interaction strengths between breast cancer subtypes, and found interactions associated with the MYC pathway and the ER alpha network to be among the most differential between basal and luminal A subtypes. PARADIGM with the Naive Bayesian assumption produced gene activity predictions that, when clustered, found groups of patients with better separation in survival than both the original version of PARADIGM and a version without the assumption. We found that this Naive Bayes assumption was valid for the vast majority of co-regulators, indicating that most co-regulators act independently on their shared target. AVAILABILITY: http://paradigm.five3genomics.com. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticBayes TheoremBreast NeoplasmsCluster AnalysisEstrogen Receptor alphaFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGenomicsHumansModels, StatisticalNeoplasmsOvarian NeoplasmsSurvival AnalysisESR1 protein, humanEstrogen Receptor alpha

Identifiers

PMID23813010
PMCPMC3694636
OpenAlexW2121270008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.