Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23812996›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2013

GeneScissors: a comprehensive approach to detecting and correcting spurious transcriptome inference owing to RNA-seq reads misalignment.

Zhaojun Zhang, Shunping Huang, Jack Wang, Xiang Zhang, Fernando Pardo Manuel de Villena, Leonard McMillan, Wei Wang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. MMR: a tool for read multi-mapper resolution.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2016
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Efficient Approach to Correct Read Alignment for Pseudogene Abundance Estimates.IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zhaojun ZhangDepartment of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Shunping Huang
Jack Wang
Xiang Zhang
Fernando Pardo Manuel de Villena
Leonard McMillan
Wei Wang
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USCase Western Reserve University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

UNC and PERLEGEN, IncP50GM076468 · NIGMS · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI CHESLER, ELISSA J · 2006 to 2015
$31.0M
An Interdisciplinary program for systems genomics of complex behaviorsP50MH090338 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PARDO-MANUEL DE VILLENA, FERNANDO · 2009 to 2010
$6.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM P50 GM076468NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM076468NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH090338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationRNA-seq techniques provide an unparalleled means for exploring a transcriptome with deep coverage and base pair level resolution. Various analysis tools have been developed to align and assemble RNA-seq data, such as the widely used TopHat/Cufflinks pipeline. A common observation is that a sizable fraction of the fragments/reads align to multiple locations of the genome. These multiple alignments pose substantial challenges to existing RNA-seq analysis tools. Inappropriate treatment may result in reporting spurious expressed genes (false positives) and missing the real expressed genes (false negatives). Such errors impact the subsequent analysis, such as differential expression analysis. In our study, we observe that ~3.5% of transcripts reported by TopHat/Cufflinks pipeline correspond to annotated nonfunctional pseudogenes. Moreover, ~10.0% of reported transcripts are not annotated in the Ensembl database. These genes could be either novel expressed genes or false discoveries.

resultsWe examine the underlying genomic features that lead to multiple alignments and investigate how they generate systematic errors in RNA-seq analysis. We develop a general tool, GeneScissors, which exploits machine learning techniques guided by biological knowledge to detect and correct spurious transcriptome inference by existing RNA-seq analysis methods. In our simulated study, GeneScissors can predict spurious transcriptome calls owing to misalignment with an accuracy close to 90%. It provides substantial improvement over the widely used TopHat/Cufflinks or MapSplice/Cufflinks pipelines in both precision and F-measurement. On real data, GeneScissors reports 53.6% less pseudogenes and 0.97% more expressed and annotated transcripts, when compared with the TopHat/Cufflinks pipeline. In addition, among the 10.0% unannotated transcripts reported by TopHat/Cufflinks, GeneScissors finds that >16.3% of them are false positives. AVAILABILITY: The software can be downloaded at http://csbio.unc.edu/genescissors/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

SoftwareAnimalsArtificial IntelligenceGene Expression ProfilingGenomicsMicePseudogenesSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, RNA

Identifiers

PMID23812996
PMCPMC3694649
OpenAlexW1973370476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.