ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2013
Simple topological properties predict functional misannotations in a metabolic network.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational approaches to enzymatic reaction assignment: a review of methods, validations, and future directions.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Integrating Omics Data in Genome-Scale Metabolic Modeling: A Methodological Perspective for Precision Medicine.Metabolites · 2023Review
- Visualizing the superfamily of metallo-β-lactamases through sequence similarity network neighborhood connectivity analysis.Heliyon · 2021Article
- Creation and analysis of biochemical constraint-based models using the COBRA Toolbox v.3.0.Nature protocols · 2019Article
- A protein network descriptor server and its use in studying protein, disease, metabolic and drug targeted networks.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2017Article
- Article
- Functional Annotations of Paralogs: A Blessing and a Curse.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016Article
- Putative bacterial interactions from metagenomic knowledge with an integrative systems ecology approach.MicrobiologyOpen · 2016Article
- PathwayBooster: a tool to support the curation of metabolic pathways.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Finding sequences for over 270 orphan enzymes.PloS one · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationMisannotation in sequence databases is an important obstacle for automated tools for gene function annotation, which rely extensively on comparison with sequences with known function. To improve current annotations and prevent future propagation of errors, sequence-independent tools are, therefore, needed to assist in the identification of misannotated gene products. In the case of enzymatic functions, each functional assignment implies the existence of a reaction within the organism's metabolic network; a first approximation to a genome-scale metabolic model can be obtained directly from an automated genome annotation. Any obvious problems in the network, such as dead end or disconnected reactions, can, therefore, be strong indications of misannotation.
resultsWe demonstrate that a machine-learning approach using only network topological features can successfully predict the validity of enzyme annotations. The predictions are tested at three different levels. A random forest using topological features of the metabolic network and trained on curated sets of correct and incorrect enzyme assignments was found to have an accuracy of up to 86% in 5-fold cross-validation experiments. Further cross-validation against unseen enzyme superfamilies indicates that this classifier can successfully extrapolate beyond the classes of enzyme present in the training data. The random forest model was applied to several automated genome annotations, achieving an accuracy of ~60% in most cases when validated against recent genome-scale metabolic models. We also observe that when applied to draft metabolic networks for multiple species, a clear negative correlation is observed between predicted annotation quality and phylogenetic distance to the major model organism for biochemistry (Escherichia coli for prokaryotes and Homo sapiens for eukaryotes). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.