Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23812875›Full record

Trial reportAdvances in therapy2013

Insulin degludec once-daily in type 2 diabetes: simple or step-wise titration (BEGIN: once simple use).

Athena Philis-Tsimikas, Meryl Brod, Marcus Niemeyer, Ann Marie Ocampo Francisco, Jeffrey Rothman

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Advances in therapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01326026 (A Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Degludec Once Daily in Insulin naïve Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus When Titrated Using Two Different Titration Algorithms), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01326026 phase3completednot on this map

A Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Degludec Once Daily in Insulin naïve Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus When Titrated Using Two Different Titration Algorithms (BEGIN™: ONCE SIMPLE USE)

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovo Nordisk A/SRan2011 to 2011Enrolled222ConditionsDiabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Armsinsulin degludec
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Practical Guidance on Basal Insulin Initiation and Titration in Asia: A Delphi-Based Consensus.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2022
    Article
  8. Randomised Controlled Trials in Diabetes Research: A Pathway to Interpreting Published Results.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2021
    Article
  9. Understanding the Clinical Profile of Insulin Degludec, the Latest Basal Insulin Approved for Use in Canada: a Narrative Review.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Practical Guidance on Effective Basal Insulin Titration for Primary Care Providers.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2019
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Insulin Initiation and Titration in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2019
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Cost-Effectiveness of Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine U100 in Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Serbia.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Insulin Matters: A Practical Approach to Basal Insulin Management in Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2018
    Article
  19. Cost-effectiveness of Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine in Adults with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Athena Philis-TsimikasScripps Whittier Diabetes Institute, 9894 Genesee Ave, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. Tsimikas.Athena@scrippshealth.org
Meryl Brod
Marcus Niemeyer
Ann Marie Ocampo Francisco
Jeffrey Rothman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInsulin degludec (IDeg) is a new basal insulin in development with a flat, ultra-long action profile that may permit dosing using a simplified titration algorithm with less frequent self-measured blood glucose (SMBG) measurements and more simplified titration steps than currently available basal insulins.

methodsThis 26-week, multi-center, open-label, randomized, treat-to-target study compared the efficacy and safety of IDeg administered once-daily in combination with metformin in insulin-naïve subjects with type 2 diabetes using two different patient-driven titration algorithms: a "Simple" algorithm, with dose adjustments based on one pre-breakfast SMBG measurement (n = 111) versus a "Step-wise" algorithm, with adjustments based on three consecutive pre-breakfast SMBG values (n = 111). IDeg was administered using the FlexTouch® insulin pen (Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsværd, Denmark), with once-weekly dose titration in both groups.

resultsGlycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) decreased from baseline to week 26 in both groups (-1.09%, IDegSimple; -0.93%, IDegStep-wise). IDegSimple was non-inferior to IDegStep-wise in lowering HbA1c [estimated treatment difference (IDegSimple - IDegStep-wise): -0.16% points (-0.39; 0.07)95% CI]. Fasting plasma glucose was reduced (-3.27 mmol/L, IDegSimple; -2.68 mmol/L, IDegStep-wise) with no significant difference between groups. Rates of confirmed hypoglycemia [1.60, IDegSimple; 1.17, IDegStep-wise events/patient year of exposure (PYE)] and nocturnal confirmed hypoglycemia (0.21, IDegSimple; 0.10, IDegStep-wise events/PYE) were low, with no significant differences between groups. Daily insulin dose after 26 weeks was 0.61 U/kg (IDegSimple) and 0.50 U/kg (IDegStep-wise). No significant difference in weight change was seen between groups by week 26 (+1.6 kg, IDegSimple; +1.1 kg, IDegStep-wise), and there were no clinically relevant differences in adverse event profiles.

conclusionIDeg was effective and well tolerated using either the Simple or Step-wise titration algorithm. While selection of an algorithm must be based on individual patient characteristics and goals, the ability to attain good glycemic control using a simplified titration algorithm may enable patient empowerment through self-titration, improved convenience, and reduced costs.

Indexed as

AgedAlgorithmsBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Dose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin, Long-ActingMaleMetforminMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeHypoglycemic Agentsinsulin degludecInsulin, Long-ActingMetformin

Identifiers

PMID23812875
PMCPMC3730088

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.