Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23812453›Full record

ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2013

Paradoxical trends and racial differences in obstetric quality and neonatal and maternal mortality.

Elizabeth A Howell, Jennifer Zeitlin, Paul Hebert, Amy Balbierz, Natalia Egorova

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Association between weighted adverse outcome score and race/ethnicity in women and neonates.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Peripartum racial/ethnic disparities.International anesthesiology clinics · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Quality of Care and Disparities in Obstetrics.Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Understanding High Utilization of Unscheduled Care in Pregnant Women of Low Socioeconomic Status.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Elizabeth A HowellDepartments of Health Evidence & Policy, Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, and Psychiatry, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York; the Epidemiological Research Unit on Perinatal Health and Women's and Children's Health, UMRS 953, INSERM Paris, France; and the Department of Health Services, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington.
Jennifer Zeitlin
Paul Hebert
Amy Balbierz
Natalia Egorova
Inserm · FR

Funding

Do Obstetrical Quality Measures Explain Racial Disparities in Perinatal OutcomesR21HD068765 · NICHD · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI HOWELL, ELIZABETH A · 2012 to 2013
$455k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD068765NICHD NIH HHS R21HD068765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate trends by race in Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality obstetric-related quality and safety indicators and their relationships to trends in inpatient maternal and neonatal mortality.

methodsWe used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2000 through 2009 and calculated obstetric hospital quality and patient safety indicators and inpatient maternal and neonatal mortality stratified by race. We examined differences in age and comorbidity-adjusted trends in black compared with white women over time in the United States and by geographic region. Proportions were analyzed by χ2 and trends by regression analysis.

resultsObstetric quality indicators varied by geographic region, but changes over time were consistent for both races. Cesarean deliveries increased similarly for black and white women, and vaginal births after cesarean delivery declined for both races but more rapidly for white women than for black women. Obstetric safety indicators improved over the study period for black and white women, with obstetric trauma decreasing significantly for both groups (28% compared with 35%, respectively) and birth trauma-injury to neonates declining for both, but changes were not significant. In striking contrast, inpatient maternal and neonatal mortality remained relatively constant during the study period, with persistently higher rates of both seen among black compared with white women (12.0 compared with 4.6 per 100,000 deliveries, P<.001 and 6.6 compared with 2.5 per 1,000 births, P<.001, respectively, in 2009).

conclusionImprovements in Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality quality indicators for obstetrics are not reflected in improvements in maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality and do not explain continued racial disparities for outcomes in pregnancies in black and white women. Quality measures that are related to pregnancy outcomes are needed and these should elucidate obstetric health disparities.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanFemaleHumansInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornMaternal MortalityObstetricsPatient SafetyPregnancyQuality Indicators, Health CareUnited StatesWhite People

Identifiers

PMID23812453
PMCPMC3701153
OpenAlexW1999972915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.