Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23812404›Full record

SynthesisIntensive care medicine2013

Alternative lipid emulsions in the critically ill: a systematic review of the evidence.

William Manzanares, Rupinder Dhaliwal, Brian Jurewitsch, Renee D Stapleton, Khursheed N Jeejeebhoy, Daren K Heyland

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Intensive care medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Management of parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients.World journal of critical care medicine · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

William ManzanaresDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de la República (UDELAR), Montevideo, Uruguay, wmanzanares@adinet.com.uy.
Rupinder Dhaliwal
Brian Jurewitsch
Renee D Stapleton
Khursheed N Jeejeebhoy
Daren K Heyland
University of Toronto · CAClinical Evaluation Research Unit · CAQueens University · BDUniversidad de la República · UYUniversity of Vermont · US

Funding

WEIGHT LOSS & ASTHMAP20RR015557 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT &ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI IRVIN, CHARLES G · 2000 to 2009
$21.4M
Pharmaconutrients as Therapies for Critical Illness: Zinc in Severe SepsisK23HL105654 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI STAPLETON, RENEE D · 2011 to 2014
$626k
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR015557NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL105654
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeParenteral lipid emulsions (LEs) are commonly rich in long-chain triglycerides derived from soybean oil (SO). SO-containing emulsions may promote systemic inflammation and therefore may adversely affect clinical outcomes. We hypothesized that alternative oil-based LEs (SO-sparing strategies) may improve clinical outcomes in critically ill adult patients compared to products containing SO emulsion only. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the effect of parenteral SO-sparing strategies on clinical outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

methodsWe searched computerized databases from 1980 to 2013. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in critically ill adult patients that evaluated SO-sparing strategies versus SO-based LEs in the context of parenteral nutrition.

resultsA total of 12 RCTs met the inclusion criteria. When the results of these RCTs were statistically aggregated, SO-sparing strategies were associated with clinically important reductions in mortality (risk ratio, RR 0.83; 95 % confidence intervals, CI 0.62, 1.11; P = 0.20), in duration of ventilation (weighted mean difference, WMD -2.57; 95 % CI -5.51, 0.37; P = 0.09), and in ICU length of stay (LOS) (WMD -2.31; 95 % CI -5.28, 0.66; P = 0.13) but none of these differences were statistically significant. SO-sparing strategies had no effect on infectious complications (RR 1.13; 95 % CI 0.87, 1.46; P = 0.35).

conclusionAlternative oil-based LEs may be associated with clinically important reductions in mortality, duration of ventilation, and ICU LOS but lack of statistical precision precludes any clinical recommendations at this time. Further research is warranted to confirm these potential positive treatment effects.

Indexed as

AdultCritical IllnessDatabases, BibliographicEmulsionsFat Emulsions, IntravenousFish OilsHumansImmune SystemInflammationIntensive Care UnitsLecithinsOxidative StressParenteral NutritionPhospholipidsPlant OilsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicEmulsionsFat Emulsions, IntravenousFish OilsLecithinsPhospholipidsPlant OilsSafflower Oilsafflower oil, lecithin emulsionSoybean Oilsoybean oil, phospholipid emulsionTriglycerides

Identifiers

PMID23812404
PMCPMC4464672
OpenAlexW2091012977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.