Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23812341›Full record

Observational studyIntensive care medicine2013

Evolution of haemodynamics and outcome of fluid-refractory septic shock in children.

Akash Deep, Chulananda D A Goonasekera, Yanzhong Wang, Joe Brierley

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Intensive care medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02083172 (Evaluating Agreement Between USCOM and 2D-echocardiographic Hemodynamic Measurements in Pediatric Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02083172 completednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating Agreement Between USCOM and 2D-echocardiographic Hemodynamic Measurements in Pediatric Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2014 to 2016Enrolled78ConditionsHemodynamically Stable, Critical IllnessArmsUltrasound Cardiac Output Monitor and 2 D-Echo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Methylene Blue for Refractory Shock in Children: A Systematic Review and Survey Practice Analysis.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Precision medicine in sepsis: reappraising glucocorticoid therapy through the lens of molecular endotypes.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Pediatric fluid resuscitation: an oxymoron?Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. AnInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Update on pediatric sepsis: a review.Journal of intensive care · 2017
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Akash DeepPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK. akash.deep@nhs.net
Chulananda D A Goonasekera
Yanzhong Wang
Joe Brierley

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaintaining threshold values of cardiac output (CO) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) when used as part of the American College of Critical Care Medicine (ACCM) haemodynamic protocol improves the outcomes in paediatric septic shock.

objectiveWe observed the evolution of CO and SVR during the intensive care admission of children with fluid-refractory septic shock and report this together with the eventual outcomes.

designProspective observational study.

settingTertiary care Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) in London.

methodsChildren admitted in fluid refractory septic shock to the Intensive Care Unit over a period of 36 months were studied. Post liver re-transplant children and delayed septic shock admissions were excluded. A non-invasive ultrasound cardiac output monitor device (USCOM) was used to measure serial haemodynamics. Children were allocated at presentation into one of two categories: (1) hospital-acquired infection and (2) community-acquired infection. Vasopressor, inotrope or inodilator therapies were titrated to maintain threshold cardiovascular parameters as per the ACCM guidelines.

resultsThirty-six children [19 male, mean age (SD) 6.78 (5.86) years] were admitted with fluid-refractory septic shock and studied. At presentation, all 18 children with hospital-acquired (HA) sepsis and 3 from among the community-acquired (CA) sepsis group were in 'warm shock' (SVRI < 800 dyne s/cm(5)/m(2)) whereas 15 of the 18 children with community-acquired sepsis and none in the hospital-acquired group were in 'cold shock' [cardiac index (CI) < 3.3 l/min/m(2)]. All 21 children in 'warm shock' were initially commenced on a vasopressor (noradrenaline). Despite an initial good response, four patients developed low CI and needed adrenaline. Similarly, all 15 children in cold shock were initially commenced on adrenaline. However, two of them subsequently required noradrenaline. Five others needed milrinone as an inodilator. In general, both groups of children had normalised SVRI and CI within 42 h of therapy but required variable doses of vasopressors, inotropes or inodilators in a heterogeneous manner. The overall 28-day survival rate was 88.9 % in both groups. Central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) was significantly (p = 0.003) lower in the community-acquired group (mean 51.72 % ± 4.26) when compared to the hospital-acquired group (mean 58.72 % ± 1.36) at presentation but showed steady improvement during therapy. Gram-positive organisms were predominant in blood cultures, 61 % in HA and 56 % in CA groups.

conclusionsIn general, we found children with community-acquired septic shock presented in cold shock whereas hospital-acquired septic shock children manifested warm shock. Both types evolved in a heterogeneous manner needing frequent revision of cardiovascular support therapy. However the 28-day survival in both groups was the same at 89 %. Frequent measurements of haemodynamics using non-invasive ultrasound helped in fine tuning cardiovascular therapies.

Indexed as

Cardiac OutputFluid TherapyVascular ResistanceChild, PreschoolFemaleHemodynamicsHumansMaleProspective StudiesShock, Septic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.