Trial reportDer Orthopade2013
[Early results of gender-specific posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty without patella resurfacing].
Trial report in Der Orthopade, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- No clinical benefit of gender-specific total knee arthroplasty.Acta orthopaedica · 2014Pooled it
- Clinical Outcomes in Men and Women following Total Knee Arthroplasty with a High-Flex Knee: No Clinical Effect of Gender.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTo address anatomical gender differences in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) specific total knee prostheses have been developed for women. Potential benefits of these modified prostheses are currently under debate. The present study investigated whether the modified design features bring benefits compared to uni-sex TKA.
methodsA total of 80 prospectively blinded and randomized patients underwent implantation of unilateral TKAs with NexGen LPS Gender Solutions (Zimmer, Warsaw, USA, group gender-specific GS prosthesis, n = 40) or NexGen LPS Flex (Zimmer, Warsaw, USA, control group standard prosthesis ST, n = 40) The follow-up was carried out 10 days and 6 weeks postoperatively. Clinical data and the subjective assessment of quality of life were evaluated using the Knee Society Clinical Rating System (KSS), the short form 36-item health survey (SF-36) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA Index (WOMAC).
resultsThe two groups showed equal values in KSS, SF-36 and WOMAC preoperatively and ten days postoperatively the GS group reached an average KSS knee score of 62.6 ± 16.1 points (ST group 56.9 ± 14.7, p = 0.184) and a functional score of 28.5 ± 12.1 (ST group 24.3 ± 15.3, p = 0.082). In the overall score the GS group reached 91.1 ± 24.1 points (ST group 81.0 ± 27.1, p = 0.104). The GS group reached a knee score of 85.5 ± 14.4 points (ST group 77.8 ± 16.8, p = 0.03) and a functional score of 68.1 ± 20.7 points (ST group 62.3 ± 18.5, p = 0.185) 6 weeks postoperatively. In the overall score the GS group reached 153.7 ± 30.7 points (ST group 139.6 ± 32.4, p = 0.048). The analysis of SF-36 and WOMAC showed no significant differences at all time points. No evidence of loosening or migration was observed in both groups.
conclusionsBased on the data presented, gender-specific TKA type NexGen LPS Gender Solutions has advantages in terms of early functional outcome. This result is not reflected in the patient satisfaction and is not considered to be clinically relevant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23812209What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.