Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23811579›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2013

Comparison of intradermal and intramuscular delivery followed by in vivo electroporation of SIV Env DNA in macaques.

Viraj Kulkarni, Margherita Rosati, Jenifer Bear, Guy R Pilkington, Rashmi Jalah, Cristina Bergamaschi, Ashish K Singh, Candido Alicea, Bhabadeb Chowdhury, Gen-Mu Zhang and 11 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Viraj KulkarniHuman Retrovirus Pathogenesis Section; Vaccine Branch; Center for Cancer Research; National Cancer Institute; Frederick, MD USA.
Margherita RosatiHuman Retrovirus Section; Vaccine Branch; Center for Cancer Research; National Cancer Institute; Frederick, MD USA.
Jenifer BearHuman Retrovirus Pathogenesis Section; Vaccine Branch; Center for Cancer Research; National Cancer Institute; Frederick, MD USA.
Guy R PilkingtonHuman Retrovirus Pathogenesis Section; Vaccine Branch; Center for Cancer Research; National Cancer Institute; Frederick, MD USA.
Rashmi JalahHuman Retrovirus Pathogenesis Section; Vaccine Branch; Center for Cancer Research; National Cancer Institute; Frederick, MD USA.
Cristina BergamaschiHuman Retrovirus Pathogenesis Section; Vaccine Branch; Center for Cancer Research; National Cancer Institute; Frederick, MD USA.
Ashish K SinghHuman Retrovirus Section; Vaccine Branch; Center for Cancer Research; National Cancer Institute; Frederick, MD USA.
Candido AliceaHuman Retrovirus Pathogenesis Section; Vaccine Branch; Center for Cancer Research; National Cancer Institute; Frederick, MD USA.
Bhabadeb ChowdhuryHuman Retrovirus Section; Vaccine Branch; Center for Cancer Research; National Cancer Institute; Frederick, MD USA.
Gen-Mu ZhangHuman Retrovirus Pathogenesis Section; Vaccine Branch; Center for Cancer Research; National Cancer Institute; Frederick, MD USA; Human Retrovirus Section; Vaccine Branch; Center for Cancer Research; National Cancer Institute; Frederick, MD USA.
Eun-Young KimDivision of Infectious Diseases; The Feinberg School of Medicine; Northwestern University; Chicago, IL USA.
Steven M WolinskyDivision of Infectious Diseases; The Feinberg School of Medicine; Northwestern University; Chicago, IL USA.
Wensheng HuangInstitute of Human Virology; Department of Microbiology and Immunology; University of Maryland School of Medicine; Baltimore, MD USA.
Yongjun GuanInstitute of Human Virology; Department of Microbiology and Immunology; University of Maryland School of Medicine; Baltimore, MD USA.
Celia LaBrancheDepartment of Surgery; Laboratory for AIDS Vaccine Research and Development; Duke University Medical Center; Durham, NC USA.
David C MontefioriDepartment of Surgery; Laboratory for AIDS Vaccine Research and Development; Duke University Medical Center; Durham, NC USA.
Kate E BroderickInovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Blue Bell, PA USA.
Niranjan Y SardesaiInovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Blue Bell, PA USA.
Antonio ValentinHuman Retrovirus Section; Vaccine Branch; Center for Cancer Research; National Cancer Institute; Frederick, MD USA.
Barbara K FelberHuman Retrovirus Pathogenesis Section; Vaccine Branch; Center for Cancer Research; National Cancer Institute; Frederick, MD USA.
George N PavlakisHuman Retrovirus Section; Vaccine Branch; Center for Cancer Research; National Cancer Institute; Frederick, MD USA.
Center for Cancer Research · USFrederick Community College · USFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research · USDuke University · USInovio Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USInstitut de Recherche Vaccinale · FROffice of Infectious Diseases · USUniversity of Baltimore · US

Funding

Prevention of AIDSZIABC010350 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI FELBER, BARBARA K · 2009 to 2025
$30.0M
Immunotherapeutic Approaches for AIDSZIABC010749 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI PAVLAKIS, GEORGE N. · 2009 to 2022
$21.6M
Intramural NIH HHSPHS HHS NIH HHSN 27201100016C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A panel of SIVmac251 transmitted Env sequences were tested for expression, function and immunogenicity in mice and macaques. The immunogenicity of a DNA vaccine cocktail expressing SIVmac239 and three transmitted SIVmac251 Env sequences was evaluated upon intradermal or intramuscular injection followed by in vivo electroporation in macaques using sequential vaccination of gp160, gp120 and gp140 expressing DNAs. Both intradermal and intramuscular vaccination regimens using the gp160 expression plasmids induced robust humoral immune responses, which further improved using the gp120 expressing DNAs. The responses showed durability of binding and neutralizing antibody titers and high avidity for>1 y. The intradermal DNA delivery regimen induced higher cross-reactive responses able to neutralize the heterologous tier 1B-like SIVsmE660_CG7V. Analysis of cellular immune responses showed induction of Env-specific memory responses and cytotoxic granzyme B(+) T cells in both vaccine groups, although the magnitude of the responses were ~10x higher in the intramuscular/electroporation group. The cellular responses induced by both regimens were long lasting and could be detected ~1 y after the last vaccination. These data show that both DNA delivery methods are able to induce robust and durable immune responses in macaques.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCross ReactionsElectroporationFemaleGene Products, envInjections, IntradermalInjections, IntramuscularMacaca mulattaMiceMice, Inbred BALB CSAIDS VaccinesSimian Immunodeficiency VirusTime FactorsT-Lymphocytes, CytotoxicAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralGene Products, envSAIDS VaccinesVaccines, DNAaviditybinding antibodyDNA vaccineeffector memoryHIVintradermalintramuscularin vivo electroporationneutralizing antibodySIVmac239SIVmac251SIVsmE660transitional memorytransmitted Env

Identifiers

PMID23811579
PMCPMC3906392
OpenAlexW2087220870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.