Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23811334›Full record

ArticleMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2014

Estimating the distance separating fluorescent protein FRET pairs.

Steven S Vogel, B Wieb van der Meer, Paul S Blank

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. ViableMethodsX · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Steven S VogelLaboratory of Molecular Physiology, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, 5625 Fishers Lane, Room TS-06F: MSC 9411, Bethesda, MD 20892-9413, USA. Electronic address: stevevog@mail.nih.gov.
B Wieb van der MeerDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Western Kentucky University, 1906 College Heights Blvd. #11077, Bowling Green, KY 42101-1077, USA.
Paul S BlankProgram in Physical Biology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr, Room 10D14: MSC 1855, Bethesda, MD 20892-1855, USA.
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development · USNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism · USWestern Kentucky University · US

Funding

FRET imaging of protein-protein interactions inside living cellsZIAAA000452 · NIAAA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM · PI VOGEL, STEVEN S · 2009 to 2025
$27.0M
Mechanisms and Intracellular Components in Exocytosis, Membrane Assembly and Repair, and Parasite ReplicationZIAHD001415 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI ZIMMERBERG, JOSHUA · 2009 to 2025
$26.0M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 AA999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA AA000452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) describes a physical phenomenon widely applied in biomedical research to estimate separations between biological molecules. Routinely, genetic engineering is used to incorporate spectral variants of the green fluorescent protein (GFPs), into cellular expressed proteins. The transfer efficiency or rate of energy transfer between donor and acceptor FPs is then assayed. As appreciable FRET occurs only when donors and acceptors are in close proximity (1-10nm), the presence of FRET may indicate that the engineered proteins associate as interacting species. For a homogeneous population of FRET pairs the separations between FRET donors and acceptors can be estimated from a measured FRET efficiency if it is assumed that donors and acceptors are randomly oriented and rotate extensively during their excited state (dynamic regime). Unlike typical organic fluorophores, the rotational correlation-times of FPs are typically much longer than their fluorescence lifetime; accordingly FPs are virtually static during their excited state. Thus, estimating separations between FP FRET pairs is problematic. To overcome this obstacle, we present here a simple method for estimating separations between FPs using the experimentally measured average FRET efficiency. This approach assumes that donor and acceptor fluorophores are randomly oriented, but do not rotate during their excited state (static regime). This approach utilizes a Monte-Carlo simulation generated look-up table that allows one to estimate the separation, normalized to the Förster distance, from the average FRET efficiency. Assuming a dynamic regime overestimates the separation significantly (by 10% near 0.5 and 30% near 0.75 efficiencies) compared to assuming a static regime, which is more appropriate for estimates of separations between FPs.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputer SimulationFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferFluorescent DyesMicroscopy, FluorescenceMonte Carlo MethodFluorescent DyesGFPKappa squared

Identifiers

PMID23811334
PMCPMC3964137
OpenAlexW1995800834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.