Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23810905›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2013

The Role of Aromatic-Aromatic Interactions in Strand-Strand Stabilization of β-Sheets.

Ivan L Budyak, Anastasia Zhuravleva, Lila M Gierasch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The conserved aromatic residue WMolecular plant pathology · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Implications of aromatic-aromatic interactions: From protein structures to peptide models.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2015
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Aromatic cluster mutations produce focal modulations of β-sheet structure.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ivan L BudyakDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
Anastasia Zhuravleva
Lila M Gierasch

Funding

NIH DIRECTOR'S PIONEER AWARDDP1OD000945 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI GIERASCH, LILA M · 2006 to 2010
$3.9M
NIH HHS DP1 OD000945NIH HHS OD000945
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aromatic-aromatic interactions have long been believed to play key roles in protein structure, folding, and binding functions. However, we still lack full understanding of the contributions of aromatic-aromatic interactions to protein stability and the timing of their formation during folding. Here, using an aromatic ladder in the β-barrel protein, cellular retinoic acid-binding protein 1 (CRABP1), as a case study, we find that aromatic π stacking plays a greater role in the Phe65-Phe71 cross-strand pair, while in another pair, Phe50-Phe65, hydrophobic interactions are dominant. The Phe65-Phe71 pair spans β-strands 4 and 5 in the β-barrel, which lack interstrand hydrogen bonding, and we speculate that it compensates energetically for the absence of strand-strand backbone interactions. Using perturbation analysis, we find that both aromatic-aromatic pairs form after the transition state for folding of CRABP1, thus playing a role in the final stabilization of the β-sheet rather than in its nucleation as had been earlier proposed. The aromatic interaction between strands 4 and 5 in CRABP1 is highly conserved in the intracellular lipid-binding protein (iLBP) family, and several lines of evidence combine to support a model wherein it acts to maintain barrel structure while allowing the dynamic opening that is necessary for ligand entry. Lastly, we carried out a bioinformatics analysis and found 51 examples of aromatic-aromatic interactions across non-hydrogen-bonded β-strands outside the iLBPs, arguing for the generality of the role played by this structural motif.

Indexed as

Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsProtein FoldingProtein StabilityAmino Acids, AromaticAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsConserved SequenceFatty Acid-Binding ProteinsHumansHydrogen BondingModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataPhenylalanineProtein Structure, SecondaryReceptors, Retinoic AcidAmino Acids, AromaticFatty Acid-Binding ProteinsPhenylalanineReceptors, Retinoic Acidretinoic acid binding protein I, cellularaccessible surface areaASAcellular retinoic acid-binding protein 1center of massCOMCRABP1dynamicsFABPfatty acid-binding proteinfoldingH-bondheteronuclear single quantum coherenceHSQChydrogen bondIFABPiLBPILBPileal lipid-binding proteinintestinal fatty acid-binding proteinintracellular lipid-binding proteinMDmolecular dynamicsMSAmultiple sequence alignmentPDBProtein Data Banktransition stateTSwild typeWTβ-barrelπ stacking

Identifiers

PMID23810905
PMCPMC3778025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.