Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23809410›Full record

ArticleThe journal of sexual medicine2013

HIV risk in group sexual encounters: an event-level analysis from a national online survey of MSM in the U.S.

Christian Grov, H Jonathon Rendina, Ana Ventuneac, Jeffrey T Parsons

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of sexual medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christian GrovDepartment of Health and Nutrition Sciences, Brooklyn College, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA; Center for HIV/AIDS Educational Studies and Training (CHEST), New York, NY, USA; CUNY School of Public Health, The Graduate Center of CUNY, New York, NY, USA.
H Jonathon Rendina
Ana Ventuneac
Jeffrey T Parsons
The Graduate Center, CUNY · USAmerican College of Chest Physicians · USCUNY School of Law · US

Funding

Intervention Targeting Substance Using Older Adults with HIVR01DA029567 · NIDA · HUNTER COLLEGE · PI PARSONS, JEFFREY T · 2010 to 2014
$2.9M
Compulsive Behaviors, Mental Health, and HIV RiskR01MH087714 · NIMH · HUNTER COLLEGE · PI PARSONS, JEFFREY T · 2010 to 2014
$2.8M
An Innovative HIV Prevention Intervention Using Social Networking TechnologyR03DA031607 · NIDA · HUNTER COLLEGE · PI LELUTIU-WEINBERGER, CORINA · 2011 to 2012
$293k
Interpersonal and intrapersonal conflict and their association with substance useF31MH095622 · NIMH · CUNY GRADUATE SCH AND UNIV CTR · PI RENDINA, H. JONATHON · 2012 to 2014
$69k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA029567NIDA NIH HHS R01DA029567NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA031607NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH095622NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH087714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionResearchers have investigated group sexual encounters (GSEs) as potential sources for HIV/STI transmission among men who have sex with men (MSM); however, much of this work has focused on organized sex parties.

aimTo compare behavioral and social characteristics of groups of men who engaged in three types of GSEs: threesomes, spontaneous group sex, and organized sex parties.

methodsIn 2012, 1,815 U.S.-based MSM completed an online survey.

main outcome measureWe compared men based on their most recent type of GSE: threesome (68.2%), spontaneous group sex (19.7%), or organized sex party (12.1%).

resultsUsing multinomial logistic regression, with type of GSE as the dependent variable, MSM who were HIV-positive, used stimulants (cocaine, methamphetamine, crack), consumed five or more alcoholic drinks, and reported receptive unprotected anal intercourse (UAI) during the most recent GSE had significantly higher odds of having had spontaneous group sex as compared to a threesome. MSM who were HIV-positive, not in a relationship, and did not report receptive UAI during the most recent GSE had significantly higher odds of having attended an organized sex party as compared to a threesome. MSM who were in a relationship, had consumed five or more alcoholic drinks, had used stimulants, and reported receptive UAI during the most recent GSE had significantly higher odds of having had spontaneous group sex as compared to an organized sex party. Compared to others, those having engaged in a GSE were more likely to report recent UAI (65% vs. 45%).

conclusionsMen having engaged in a GSE were at greater risk for behaviors that transmit HIV and STIs. Unique social and behavioral characteristics inherent to threesomes, spontaneous group sex, and sex parties highlight the need to identify prevention strategies to help those who participate in GSEs reduce their risk for HIV and STI transmission.

Indexed as

Group ProcessesHomosexuality, MaleSexual PartnersUnsafe SexAdultAlcohol DrinkingAmphetamine-Related DisordersCocaine-Related DisordersHealth SurveysHIV InfectionsHumansInternetMaleRisk-TakingSocial BehaviorUnited StatesGay and Bisexual MenGroup SexMen Who Have Sex with MenSex PartiesSubstance UseUnprotected Anal Intercourse

Identifiers

PMID23809410
PMCPMC3775898
OpenAlexW1906169156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.