Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23809283›Full record

ReviewAdvances in chronic kidney disease2013

Health literacy: emerging evidence and applications in kidney disease care.

Leigh Anne Dageforde, Kerri L Cavanaugh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in chronic kidney disease, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Living Kidney Donors' Residential Neighborhoods: Driver or Barrier of Postdonation Follow-Up?American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2026
    Article
  7. A Qualitative Study to Investigate the Nutrition Perspectives and Experiences of Veterans with CKD.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Assessing the understandability and actionability of online resources for patients undergoing hemodialysis.Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Missing In-Center Hemodialysis Sessions among Patients with End Stage Renal Disease in Banda Aceh, Indonesia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. A Validation Study of the Korean Version of the Nurses' Patient Education Questionnaire.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Leigh Anne DagefordeVanderbilt Transplant Center and Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Kerri L Cavanaugh

Funding

Addressing Literacy and Numeracy in Self-care & Clinical Outcomes in ESRDK23DK080952 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI CAVANAUGH, KERRI · 2008 to 2012
$915k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK080952NIDDK NIH HHS K23DK080952
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health literacy represents the communication among patients, their social networks, providers, and health systems to promote patients' understanding and engagement in their care. This is particularly relevant in kidney disease, in which the complexity of the medical condition and the extent of the health-care team require strategies to overcome health-literacy-related barriers. Limited literacy is common in patients with all stages of kidney disease and is associated with important outcomes, including reduced knowledge, less adherence, hospitalization, and death. A growing understanding and characterization of the health system, or organizational health literacy, may further our understanding of this dynamic relationship. Although various valid methods exist, assessment of health literacy within individuals or systematically within care settings has not been routinely performed. This may be in part due to the limited research in kidney-specific strategies to address limited health literacy. Future research to understand the mechanisms of health literacy will permit targeted, efficient interventions to bridge gaps and improve outcomes even in patients with complex kidney disease.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth LiteracyHumansKidney Failure, ChronicKidney TransplantationMalePatient Education as TopicProgram EvaluationRenal DialysisRenal Insufficiency, ChronicRisk AssessmentUnited States

Identifiers

PMID23809283
PMCPMC3767572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.