Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23809234›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2015

Assessing patient preferences for the delivery of different community-based models of care using a discrete choice experiment.

Simon Dixon, Susan A Nancarrow, Pamela M Enderby, Anna M Moran, Stuart G Parker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Nurses' activities and time management during home healthcare visits.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Simon DixonSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Susan A NancarrowSchool of Health and Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW, Australia.
Pamela M EnderbySchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Anna M MoranSchool of Community Health, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW, Australia.
Stuart G ParkerSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Funding

Department of Health 08/1519/95
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess patient preferences for different models of care defined by location of care, frequency of care and principal carer within community-based health-care services for older people.

designDiscrete choice experiment administered within a face-to-face interview.

settingAn intermediate care service in a large city within the United Kingdom.

participantsThe projected sample size was calculated to be 200; however, 77 patients were recruited to the study. The subjects had recently been discharged from hospital and were living at home and were receiving short-term care by a publicly funded intermediate care service.

interventionsNot applicable.

main outcome measureThe degree of preference, measured using single utility score, for individual service characteristics presented within a series of potential care packages.

resultsLocation of care was the dominant service characteristics with care at home being the strongly stated preference when compared with outpatient care (0.003), hospital care (<0.001) and nursing home care (<0.001) relative to home care, although this was less pronounced among less sick patients. Additionally, the respondents indicated a dislike for very frequent care contacts. No particular type of professional carer background was universally preferred but, unsurprisingly, there was evidence that sick patients showed a preference for nurse-led care.

conclusionsPatients have clear preferences for the location for their care and were able to state preferences between different care packages when their ideal service was not available. Service providers can use this information to assess which models of care are most preferred within resource constraints.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorCommunity Health ServicesPatient PreferenceAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversDelivery of Health CareFemaleHealth PolicyHome Care ServicesHumansIntermediate Care FacilitiesInterviews as TopicMaleUnited Kingdomallied healthassistantscommunity rehabilitation servicesconjoint analysisintermediate caremodels of careoutcomespatient preferencestaffsupport workers

Identifiers

PMID23809234
PMCPMC5060844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.