Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23808992›Full record

ArticleJournal of viral hepatitis2013

Adherence to PEG/ribavirin treatment for chronic hepatitis C: prevalence, patterns, and predictors of missed doses and nonpersistence.

D M Evon, D A Esserman, J E Bonner, T Rao, M W Fried, C E Golin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of viral hepatitis, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Patient adherence issues in the treatment of hepatitis C.Patient preference and adherence · 2014
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D M EvonDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. donna_evon@med.unc.edu
D A Esserman
J E Bonner
T Rao
M W Fried
C E Golin
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Virology, Immunology, and Microbiology CoreP30AI050410 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVID M. MARGOLIS · 2001 to 2026
$76.9M
UNC CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE AWARD: BPCAUL1RR025747 · NCRR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RUNGE, MARSCHALL S. · 2008 to 2011
$44.6M
Mentoring Junior Faculty: Viral hepatitis Clinical ResearchK24DK066144 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI FRIED, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2014
$1.5M
Mentoring Junior Investigators: Comprehensive HIV PreventionK24HD069204 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GOLIN, CAROL E · 2013 to 2017
$789k
An Adherence and Depression Intervention for Patients During Hepatitis C TherapyK23DK089004 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI EVON, DONNA MARIE · 2010 to 2013
$533k
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025747NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR025747NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050410NIAID NIH HHS P30-AI50410NICHD NIH HHS K24 HD069204NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK089004NIDDK NIH HHS K23DK089004-02NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK066144NIDDK NIH HHS K24DK066144-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adherence to treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) maximizes treatment efficacy. Missed doses and failing to persist on treatment are two patient-level processes that are rarely defined or analysed separately from other factors affecting treatment adherence. We evaluated the prevalence and patterns of missed doses and nonpersistence, and identified patient characteristics associated with these outcomes. Missed doses of ribavirin (RBV) and peginterferon (PEG), measured prospectively in Virahep-C using electronic monitoring technology, were analysed using generalized estimating equations. Cox proportional hazards models analysed time to nonpersistence from baseline to week 24 (N = 401) and from week 24 to 48 in Responders (N = 242). Average proportion of PEG- and RBV-missed doses increased over time from 5% to 15% and 7% to 27%, respectively. Patients who were younger, African-American, unemployed, or unmarried were at greater risk of missing PEG from week 0 to 24; higher baseline depression predicted missing PEG from weeks 24 to 48. Patients who were younger or African-American were more likely to miss daily RBV from weeks 0 to 24; and those without private insurance or employment were more likely to miss RBV from weeks 24 to 48. Fifty-two patients failed to persist on treatment for patient-driven deviations. Predictors of nonpersistence from weeks 0 to 24 included younger age, lower education, public or no insurance, or worse baseline headaches. In conclusion, electronic monitoring and the prospective Virahep-C design afforded a unique opportunity to evaluate missing doses and nonpersistence separately, and identify patients at risk of nonadherence. These processes will be important to investigate as the dosing schedules of antiviral regimens become increasingly complex.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHepatitis C, ChronicHumansInterferonsMaleRibavirinRisk FactorsTime FactorsInterferonsRibavirincompliancedoseinterferonlivermedication adherence

Identifiers

PMID23808992
PMCPMC3703869
OpenAlexW2080809577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.