Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23808607›Full record

ArticleOmics : a journal of integrative biology2013

Evaluation of normalization methods to pave the way towards large-scale LC-MS-based metabolomics profiling experiments.

Bedilu Alamirie Ejigu, Dirk Valkenborg, Geert Baggerman, Manu Vanaerschot, Erwin Witters, Jean-Claude Dujardin, Tomasz Burzykowski, Maya Berg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Omics : a journal of integrative biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. LC-HRMS Lipidomic Fingerprints in Serbian Cohort of Schizophrenia Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Bedilu Alamirie EjiguI-BioStat, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium. bedilu.ejigu@uhasselt.be
Dirk Valkenborg
Geert Baggerman
Manu Vanaerschot
Erwin Witters
Jean-Claude Dujardin
Tomasz Burzykowski
Maya Berg
Hasselt University · BEResearch Institute for Tropical Medicine · PHFlemish Institute for Technological Research · BEInstituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BEUniversity of Antwerp · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combining liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)-based metabolomics experiments that were collected over a long period of time remains problematic due to systematic variability between LC-MS measurements. Until now, most normalization methods for LC-MS data are model-driven, based on internal standards or intermediate quality control runs, where an external model is extrapolated to the dataset of interest. In the first part of this article, we evaluate several existing data-driven normalization approaches on LC-MS metabolomics experiments, which do not require the use of internal standards. According to variability measures, each normalization method performs relatively well, showing that the use of any normalization method will greatly improve data-analysis originating from multiple experimental runs. In the second part, we apply cyclic-Loess normalization to a Leishmania sample. This normalization method allows the removal of systematic variability between two measurement blocks over time and maintains the differential metabolites. In conclusion, normalization allows for pooling datasets from different measurement blocks over time and increases the statistical power of the analysis, hence paving the way to increase the scale of LC-MS metabolomics experiments. From our investigation, we recommend data-driven normalization methods over model-driven normalization methods, if only a few internal standards were used. Moreover, data-driven normalization methods are the best option to normalize datasets from untargeted LC-MS experiments.

Indexed as

Chromatography, LiquidMass SpectrometryMetabolomicsCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyLeishmaniaMetabolomeReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID23808607
PMCPMC3760460
OpenAlexW1980010799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.