ReviewUpdates in surgery2014
Focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic adenoma: current diagnosis and management.
Review in Updates in surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography as a method of monitoring focal liver lesions - initial report.Clinical and experimental hepatology · 2024Article
- Usefulness of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Differentiation between Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Benign Liver Lesions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Panel of potential lncRNA biomarkers can distinguish various types of liver malignant and benign tumors.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2021Article
- Current Approaches in the Management of Hepatic Adenomas.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019Review
- Long-term follow-up of hepatic adenoma and adenomatosis: analysis of size change on imaging with histopathological correlation.Clinical radiology · 2018Article
- Hepatobiliary Tumors: Update on Diagnosis and Management.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2015Review
- Article
- Oestrogen hormone receptors in focal nodular hyperplasia.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2015Article
- Management of hepatic adenomatosis.Current gastroenterology reports · 2015Review
- [Focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma].Der Radiologe · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Benign liver tumors are common lesions that can be classified into cystic and solid lesions. Cystic lesions are the most frequent; however, they rarely represent a diagnostic or therapeutic challenge. In contrast, solid lesions are more difficult to characterize and management remains controversial. The wide availability and use of advanced imaging modalities, including ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging have led to increased identification of incidental liver masses. Although some of these incidentally discovered masses are malignant, most are benign and must be included in the differential diagnosis. In this article we review FNH and HA. Its etiology, biological behavior, diagnosis, and treatment will be highlighted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.