SynthesisTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2013
Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis of prospective studies.
Synthesis in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Vitamin D and Multiple Health Outcomes: An Umbrella Review of Observational Studies, Randomized Controlled Trials, and Mendelian Randomization Studies.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Pooled it
- Serum Vitamin D Status and Breast Cancer Risk by Receptor Status: A Systematic Review.Nutrition and cancer · 2018Pooled it
- Vitamin D exposure and Risk of Breast Cancer: a meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2018Pooled it
- Serum Calcium and the Risk of Breast Cancer: Findings from the Swedish AMORIS Study and a Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Vitamin D intake, blood 25(OH)D levels, and breast cancer risk or mortality: a meta-analysis.British journal of cancer · 2014Pooled it
- A Randomized Trial of Calcium Plus Vitamin D Supplementation and Risk of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2021Trial
- Trial
- Vitamin D, Menopausal Health and COVID-19: Critical Appraisal of Current Data.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- The role of vitamin D in menopausal women's health.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Review
- Vitamin D supplementation and immune-related markers: an update from nutrigenetic and nutrigenomic studies.The British journal of nutrition · 2022Review
- Bone mineral density in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer: a prospective cohort study.NPJ breast cancer · 2022Article
- Assessment the effect of vitamin D supplementation on plasma vitamin D levels, inflammation, and oxidative stress biomarkers based on vitamin D receptor genetic variation in breast cancer survivors: a protocol for clinical trial.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2021Article
- Is Vitamin D Deficiency Related to Increased Cancer Risk in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus?International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Article
- A multicenter case control study of association of vitamin D with breast cancer among women in Karachi, Pakistan.PloS one · 2020Article
- Circulating vitamin D concentrations and risk of breast and prostate cancer: a Mendelian randomization study.International journal of epidemiology · 2019Article
- Nutrition in the Prevention of Breast Cancer: A Middle Eastern Perspective.Frontiers in public health · 2019Review
- Vitamin D: And its role in breast cancer.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2018Review
- Association between Changes in Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels and Survival in Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.Journal of breast cancer · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There were some case-control studies, nested case-control studies, and cohort studies with controversial results on the association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and breast cancer risk. Case-control studies are prone to selection bias, which limit the strength and quality of the evidence. To overcome the shortcoming of the case-control studies, the meta-analysis of prospective studies including nested case-control studies and cohort studies was conducted. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched, and the last retrieval date was March 24, 2013. For the highest versus the lowest level of serum 25(OH)D, the relative risks (RRs) and its 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from each study were used to estimate summary RR and its 95% CI. Subgroup analyses by geographic region, menopausal status, and adjusted status of RR were also performed, respectively. A dose-response association between serum 25(OH)D concentration and breast cancer risk was assessed. Fourteen articles with 9,110 breast cancer cases and 16,244 controls were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, serum 25(OH)D levels were inversely significantly associated with breast cancer risk (RR = 0.845, 95% CI = 0.750-0.951). Inversely statistically significant associations were observed in North American studies, postmenopausal women, and studies with adjusted and unadjusted RR, respectively. No statistically significant associations were observed in European studies and premenopausal women, respectively. Dose-response analysis showed that every 10 ng/mL increment in serum 25(OH)D concentration was associated with a significant 3.2% reduction in breast cancer risk. This meta-analysis provides evidence of a significantly inverse association between serum 25(OH)D concentration and breast cancer risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23807676What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.