SynthesisTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2013
Association between X-ray repair cross-complementation group 1 rs25487 polymorphism and pancreatic cancer risk.
Synthesis in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between Polymorphisms of X-Ray Repair Cross Complementing Group 1 Gene and Pancreatic Cancer Risk: a Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2019Pooled it
- Lack of association of XRCC1 rs1799782 genetic polymorphism with risk of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014Pooled it
- Article
- Association between OGG1 gene single nucleotide polymorphisms and risk of pancreatic cancer in Chinese.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous published studies suggested that genetic polymorphisms in DNA repair genes could modify the DNA repair capacity and could be associated with pancreatic cancer risk. However, previous studies on the association between X-ray repair cross-complementation group 1 (XRCC1) rs25487 (Arg399Gln) polymorphism and pancreatic cancer risk reported inconsistent results. To obtain a more precise estimation of the association between XRCC1 rs25487 polymorphism and pancreatic cancer risk, we performed a meta-analysis of previous published studies by calculating the pooled odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Eight individual studies with 5,542 subjects from six publications were finally included into this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis of total eight studies showed that there was no association between XRCC1 rs25487 polymorphism and pancreatic cancer risk in total population under all four genetic models (Gln versus Arg: OR = 1.10, 95% CI 0.95-1.28, P = 0.199; GlnGln versus ArgArg: OR = 1.15, 95% CI 0.93-1.41, P = 0.191; GlnGln/ArgGln versus ArgArg: OR = 1.10, 95% CI 0.97-1.25, P = 0.127; GlnGln versus ArgArg/ArgGln: OR = 1.12, 95% CI 0.92-1.36, P = 0.253). Subgroup analysis showed that there was no association between XRCC1 rs25487 polymorphism and pancreatic cancer risk in Caucasians, but XRCC1 rs25487 polymorphism was associated with pancreatic cancer risk in Asians (GlnGln/ArgGln versus ArgArg: OR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.01-1.53, P = 0.040). Therefore, the meta-analysis suggests that XRCC1 rs25487 polymorphism is associated with pancreatic cancer risk in Asians. Further studies with more participants are needed to provide a more precise estimation on the association above.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.