Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23807272›Full record

Trial reportAIDS (London, England)2013

Risk behavior among women enrolled in a randomized controlled efficacy trial of an adenoviral vector vaccine to prevent HIV acquisition.

Richard M Novak, Barbara Metch, Susan Buchbinder, Robinson Cabello, Yeycy Donastorg, John-Peter Figoroa, Hend Abdul-Jauwad, Hend Adbul-Jauwad, Patrice Joseph, Ellen Koenig and 4 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in AIDS (London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Adbul-Jauwad, Hend [corrected to Abdul-Jauwad, Hend]
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Richard M NovakSection of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60162, USA. rmnovak@uic.edu
Barbara Metch
Susan Buchbinder
Robinson Cabello
Yeycy Donastorg
John-Peter Figoroa
Hend Abdul-Jauwad
Hend Adbul-Jauwad
Patrice Joseph
Ellen Koenig
David Metzger
Magda Sobieszycz
Mark Tyndall
Carmen Zorilla

Funding

LOC: HIV Vaccine Trials NetworkUM1AI068614 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Dan H. Barouch, Lawrence Corey · 2011 to 2026
$1175.6M
SDMC: HIV Vaccine Trials NetworkUM1AI068635 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Peter B. Gilbert, Yunda Huang · 2011 to 2026
$385.9M
Targeting High-Risk Women for HVTN and Microbicide TrialsU01AI069554 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI NOVAK, RICHARD M · 2007 to 2011
$3.5M
Targeting High-Risk Women for HVTN and Microbicide TrialsUM1AI069554 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI NOVAK, RICHARD M · 2012 to 2014
$1.7M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI069554NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068614NIAID NIH HHS UM1AI068614NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068635NIAID NIH HHS UM1AI068635NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI069554NIAID NIH HHS UM1AI069554
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesReport of risk behavior, HIV incidence, and pregnancy rates among women participating in the STEP study, which is a phase IIB trial of MRKAd5 HIV-1 gag/pol/nef vaccine in HIV-negative individuals who were at high risk of HIV-1.

designProspective multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.

methodsWomen were from North American, and from Caribbean and South America (CSA) sites. Risk behavior was collected at screening and 6-month intervals. Differences in characteristics between groups were tested with chi-square, two-sided Fisher's exact tests, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Generalized estimating equation models were used to assess behavioral change.

resultsAmong 1134 enrolled women, the median number of male partners was 18; 73.8% reported unprotected vaginal sex, 15.9% unprotected anal sex and 10.8% evidence of a sexually transmitted infection in the 6 months prior to baseline. With 3344 person-years of follow-up, there were 15 incident HIV infections: incidence rate was 0.45 per 100 person-years [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25, 0.74]. Crack cocaine use in both regions [relative risk (RR) 2.4 (1.7, 3.3)] and in CSA, unprotected anal sex [RR 6.4 (3.8, 10.7)], and drug use [RR 4.1 (2.1, 8.0)] were baseline risk behaviors associated with HIV acquisition. There was a marked reduction in risk behaviors after study enrollment with some recurrence in unprotected vaginal sex. Of 963 nonsterilized women, 304 (31.6%) became pregnant.

conclusionCrack cocaine use and unprotected anal sex are important risk criteria to identify high-risk women for HIV-efficacy trials. Pregnancy during the trial was a common occurrence and needs to be considered in trial planning for prevention trials in women.

Indexed as

Risk-TakingAcquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeAdenoviruses, HumanAdolescentAdultAIDS VaccinesCaribbean RegionDouble-Blind MethodDrug CarriersFemaleHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedNorth AmericaPlacebosPregnancyAIDS VaccinesDrug CarriersPlacebos

Identifiers

PMID23807272
PMCPMC3918499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.