ArticleJournal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie2013
Cephalometric assessment of human fetal head specimens.
Article in Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Automated craniofacial biometry with 3D T2w fetal MRI.PLOS digital health · 2024Article
- Automated Craniofacial Biometry with 3D T2w Fetal MRI.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Characterization of the perinatal mandible growth pattern: preliminary results.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPast investigations of prenatal craniofacial growth have largely relied on histological sections. Few studies have taken measurements on three-dimensional representations (3D reconstruction, 3D CT, postmortem) or varying depth levels (ultrasound), and we know of no craniofacial growth studies done on cleared-and-stained specimens of whole fetal heads. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study comprised 14 human fetal head specimens cleared and stained with alizarin red and alcian blue. They had been stored in glycerol and represented weeks 8-12 of gestation, with crown-rump lengths ranging from 23-145 mm. These specimens were cephalometrically analyzed in norma frontalis and norma lateralis, which notably included the opportunity for side-to-side comparison.
resultsAs the cranial membrane bones progressively approached each other, the orbits, maxilla, and mandible gradually grew wider. Likewise, the sagittal dimensions of the maxilla and mandible increased continuously and synchronically. We noted side-to-side differences ranging from 2-5 mm. Another notable finding concerned the inclination of the maxilla relative to the cranial base, which increased more on the right than on the left side.
conclusionThis is the first investigation presenting side-to-side comparative measurements of human fetal head specimens. Such measurements are essential in the quest toward validating the findings of other imaging techniques such as CT or MRI and-most importantly-intrauterine sonography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.