Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23807206›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2013

RNA polymerase between lesion bypass and DNA repair.

Alexandra M Deaconescu

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. A novel skew analysis reveals substitution asymmetries linked to genetic code GC-biases and PolIII a-subunit isoforms.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2016
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexandra M DeaconescuRosenstiel Basic Medical Sciences Research Center, Brandeis University, 415 South St., MS029, Waltham, MA, 02454, USA, deacona@brandeis.edu.
Brandeis University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA damage leads to heritable changes in the genome via DNA replication. However, as the DNA helix is the site of numerous other transactions, notably transcription, DNA damage can have diverse repercussions on cellular physiology. In particular, DNA lesions have distinct effects on the passage of transcribing RNA polymerases, from easy bypass to almost complete block of transcription elongation. The fate of the RNA polymerase positioned at a lesion is largely determined by whether the lesion is structurally subtle and can be accommodated and eventually bypassed, or bulky, structurally distorting and requiring remodeling/complete dissociation of the transcription elongation complex, excision, and repair. Here we review cellular responses to DNA damage that involve RNA polymerases with a focus on bacterial transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair and lesion bypass via transcriptional mutagenesis. Emphasis is placed on the explosion of new structural information on RNA polymerases and relevant DNA repair factors and the mechanistic models derived from it.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA RepairTranscription, GeneticAdenosine TriphosphatasesBacterial ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsModels, GeneticProtein BindingProtein Structure, TertiaryTranscription FactorsAdenosine TriphosphatasesBacterial ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesEscherichia coli ProteinsTranscription Factorstranscription repair coupling factor protein, BacteriaUvrA protein, E coli

Identifiers

PMID23807206
PMCPMC11113250
OpenAlexW2074537895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.