Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23807173›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2013

Association between ERCC1 and XPA expression and polymorphisms and the response to cisplatin in testicular germ cell tumours.

J Mendoza, J Martínez, C Hernández, D Pérez-Montiel, C Castro, E Fabián-Morales, M Santibáñez, R González-Barrios, J Díaz-Chávez, M A Andonegui and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Targeting the DNA Damage Response for Cancer Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. XPA: DNA Repair Protein of Significant Clinical Importance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

J MendozaUnidad de Investigación Biomédica en Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan)-Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Avenida San Fernando 22, México D.F. 14080, México.
J Martínez
C Hernández
D Pérez-Montiel
C Castro
E Fabián-Morales
M Santibáñez
R González-Barrios
J Díaz-Chávez
M A Andonegui
N Reynoso
L F Oñate
M A Jiménez
M Núñez
R Dyer
L A Herrera
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXInstitute for Social Security and Services for State Workers · MXInstituto Nacional de Cancerología · MXInstituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas · PE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCisplatin cures over 80% of testicular germ cell tumours (TGCTs), and nucleotide-excision repair (NER) modifies the sensitivity to cisplatin. We explored the association between NER proteins and their polymorphisms with cisplatin sensitivity (CPS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with non-seminomatous (ns)-TGCTs.

methodsThe expression of ERCC1 and XPA and the presence of γH2AX were evaluated in cancer cell lines and in fresh ns-TGCTs. The ERCC1 protein was also determined in ns-TGCTs. The differences between CPS and non-CPS cell lines and patients were analysed by Student's t- or χ(2)-tests. The differences in OS were analysed using the log-rank test, and the hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using the Cox model.

resultsHigh ERCC1 expression was observed in the non-CPS cells, and both ERCC1 and γH2AX expressions were augmented after cisplatin treatment. Increased ERCC1 expression was also identified in non-CPS patients. Neither polymorphism was associated with either CPS or OS. The presence of ERCC1 was associated with non-CPS (P=0.05) and adjusted in the prognosis groups. The HR in ERCC1-negative and non-CPS patients was >14.43, and in ERCC1-positive and non-CPS patients the HR was >11.86 (P<0.001).

conclusionsHigh levels of ERCC1 were associated with non-CPS, suggesting that ERCC1 could be used as a potential indicator of the response to cisplatin and prognosis in ns-TGCTs.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorCisplatinDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA RepairDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEndonucleasesHistonesHumansMaleNeoplasms, Germ Cell and EmbryonalOrchiectomyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSurvival RateTesticular NeoplasmsXeroderma Pigmentosum Group A ProteinAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatinDNA-Binding ProteinsEndonucleasesERCC1 protein, humanH2AX protein, humanHistonesXeroderma Pigmentosum Group A ProteinXPA protein, human

Identifiers

PMID23807173
PMCPMC3708571
OpenAlexW2099751710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.