Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23807161›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2013

IRF-1 responsiveness to IFN-γ predicts different cancer immune phenotypes.

D Murtas, D Maric, V De Giorgi, J Reinboth, A Worschech, P Fetsch, A Filie, M L Ascierto, D Bedognetti, Q Liu and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. RNA NAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

D MurtasInfectious Disease and Immunogenetics Section (IDIS), Department of Transfusion Medicine, Clinical Center and trans-NIH Center for Human Immunology (CHI), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
D Maric
V De Giorgi
J Reinboth
A Worschech
P Fetsch
A Filie
M L Ascierto
D Bedognetti
Q Liu
L Uccellini
L Chouchane
E Wang
F M Marincola
S Tomei
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center · USCenter for Cancer Research · USWeill Cornell Medical College in Qatar · QAImmungenetics (Germany) · DEUniversity of Genoa · ITUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

Cytopathology CoreZICBC011052 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI FILIE, ARMANDO · 2009 to 2025
$30.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral lines of evidence suggest a dichotomy between immune active and quiescent cancers, with the former associated with a good prognostic phenotype and better responsiveness to immunotherapy. Central to such dichotomy is the master regulator of the acute inflammatory process interferon regulatory factor (IRF)-1. However, it remains unknown whether the responsiveness of IRF-1 to cytokines is able to differentiate cancer immune phenotypes.

methodsIRF-1 activation was measured in 15 melanoma cell lines at basal level and after treatment with IFN-γ, TNF-α and a combination of both. Microarray analysis was used to compare transcriptional patterns between cell lines characterised by high or low IRF-1 activation.

resultsWe observed a strong positive correlation between IRF-1 activation at basal level and after IFN-γ and TNF-α treatment. Microarray demonstrated that three cell lines with low and three with high IRF-1 inducible translocation scores differed in the expression of 597 transcripts. Functional interpretation analysis showed mTOR and Wnt/β-cathenin as the top downregulated pathways in the cell lines with low inducible IRF-1 activation, suggesting that a low IRF-1 inducibility recapitulates a cancer phenotype already described in literature characterised by poor prognosis.

conclusionOur findings support the central role of IRF-1 in influencing different tumour phenotypes.

Indexed as

beta CateninCell Line, TumorEnzyme ActivationHumansImmunotherapyInterferon-gammaInterferon Regulatory Factor-1MelanomaNF-kappa BTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesTranscription, GeneticTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaWnt Proteinsbeta CateninInterferon-gammaInterferon Regulatory Factor-1IRF1 protein, humanMTOR protein, humanNF-kappa BTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaWnt Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23807161
PMCPMC3708578
OpenAlexW1972648258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.