Trial reportWorld journal of surgery2013
Initial experiences of an enhanced recovery protocol in esophageal surgery.
Trial report in World journal of surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02478996 (Internet-based Perioperative Exercise Program in Patients With Barrett's Carcinoma Scheduled for Esophagectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Internet-based Perioperative Exercise Program in Patients With Barrett's Carcinoma Scheduled for Esophagectomy (iPEP Study) A Prospective Randomized-controlled Pilot Trial
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of different rehabilitation strategies on physical function and complications in postoperative patients with esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Early oral intake and early removal of nasogastric tube post-esophagectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2022Pooled it
- Enhanced recovery pathways vs standard care pathways in esophageal cancer surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2020Pooled it
- Consensus Review of Optimal Perioperative Care in Breast Reconstruction: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations.Plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2017Guideline
- Impact of enhanced recovery program on patients with esophageal cancer in comparison with traditional care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017Pooled it
- Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in oesophageal cancer surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- Systematic review of enhanced recovery after gastro-oesophageal cancer surgery.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2015Pooled it
- Trial
- Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in esophagectomy: a comprehensive review of current practices.Updates in surgery · 2026Review
- Laparoscopic round‑ligament duodenostomy synchronized with posterior mediastinal reconstruction.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2025Article
- Long-term outcomes of modified enhanced recovery after surgery (mERAS) protocols in peri-operative management of minimally invasive esophagectomy.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Impact of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol on 3-year survival and outcomes following esophagectomy: a retrospective cohort study of 124 patients.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Article
- Short-term outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in minimally invasive oesophagectomy: A prospective study.Journal of minimal access surgery · 2024Article
- Optimal discharge planning for esophagectomy patients with enhanced recovery after surgery: Recommendations.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
- Improved anastomotic leakage rates after the "flap and wrap" reconstruction in Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2022Observational
- The Optimal Feeding Enterostomy Creation During Esophagectomy to Reduce the Long-Term Risk of Small Bowel Obstruction.World journal of surgery · 2020Article
- The evolution of fast track protocols after oesophagectomy.Journal of thoracic disease · 2019Review
- Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes, Opioid Use, and Complications after Esophageal Cancer Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2018Article
- An Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Pathway for Microvascular Breast Reconstruction Is Safe and Effective.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2018Article
- Feasibility and outcomes of modified enhanced recovery after surgery for nursing management of aged patients undergoing esophagectomy.Journal of thoracic disease · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA recent development in gastrointestinal surgery is the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs. Evidence regarding the benefit of these programs in patients undergoing esophageal surgery is scarce. We investigated the feasibility and possible benefit of a perioperative ERAS program in patients undergoing esophagectomy for malignant disease.
methodsThe ERAS program was initiated in 2009. Patients who underwent esophagectomy and were treated according to the ERAS program were included. Items of ERAS included preoperative nutrition, early extubation, early removal of nasogastric tube, and early mobilization. Primary outcome parameters were hospital stay and the incidence of postoperative complications. Outcome parameters in the ERAS cohort were compared to a cohort of patients who underwent surgical resection in the year prior to the implementation of the ERAS protocol. A feasibility analysis was performed among a sample of ERAS patients to determine the number of achieved items per patient.
resultsBetween 2008 and August 2010, 181 patients in our department underwent esophagectomy. Of these, 103 patients were included in the ERAS program (ERAS+ group) and were compared to 78 patients who had undergone an esophagectomy in 2008 (ERAS- group). Overall hospital stay was 14 days versus 15 days (ERAS+ and ERAS-, respectively; p = 0.013). There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications in either group. The percentage of achieved items varied between 42 and 93 % per item.
conclusionsThe implementation of an ERAS program in esophageal surgery was feasible and resulted in a small but significant reduction in overall hospital stay, whereas overall morbidity was not affected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.