Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23806804›Full record

ReviewNeuropharmacology2014

Homeostatic plasticity at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction.

C Andrew Frank

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed, 154 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. CaeLife · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. CabioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  9. Neto proteins differentially modulate the gating properties ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Intrinsic Homeostatic Plasticity in Mouse and Human Sensory Neurons.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  13. Precise mapping of one classic and three novelmicroPublication biology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Postsynaptic Potential Energy as Determinant of Synaptic Plasticity.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

C Andrew FrankDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. Electronic address: andy-frank@uiowa.edu.
University of Iowa · US

Funding

How Ephexin Signaling Promotes Neuronal StabilityR00NS062738 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI FRANK, CARL ANDREW · 2010 to 2012
$725k
How Ephexin Signaling Promotes Neuronal StabilityK99NS062738 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FRANK, CARL ANDREW · 2008 to 2009
$171k
NINDS NIH HHS K99 NS062738NINDS NIH HHS R00 NS062738
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In biology, homeostasis refers to how cells maintain appropriate levels of activity. This concept underlies a balancing act in the nervous system. Synapses require flexibility (i.e. plasticity) to adjust to environmental challenges. Yet there must also exist regulatory mechanisms that constrain activity within appropriate physiological ranges. An abundance of evidence suggests that homeostatic regulation is critical in this regard. In recent years, important progress has been made toward identifying molecules and signaling processes required for homeostatic forms of neuroplasticity. The Drosophila melanogaster third instar larval neuromuscular junction (NMJ) has been an important experimental system in this effort. Drosophila neuroscientists combine genetics, pharmacology, electrophysiology, imaging, and a variety of molecular techniques to understand how homeostatic signaling mechanisms take shape at the synapse. At the NMJ, homeostatic signaling mechanisms couple retrograde (muscle-to-nerve) signaling with changes in presynaptic calcium influx, changes in the dynamics of the readily releasable vesicle pool, and ultimately, changes in presynaptic neurotransmitter release. Roles in these processes have been demonstrated for several molecules and signaling systems discussed here. This review focuses primarily on electrophysiological studies or data. In particular, attention is devoted to understanding what happens when NMJ function is challenged (usually through glutamate receptor inhibition) and the resulting homeostatic responses. A significant area of study not covered in this review, for the sake of simplicity, is the homeostatic control of synapse growth, which naturally, could also impinge upon synapse function in myriad ways. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'Homeostatic Synaptic Plasticity'.

Indexed as

Neuronal PlasticityAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterHomeostasisNeuromuscular JunctionSynapsesCalciumCalcium channelsCalcium influxCa(V)2DrosophilaElectrophysiologyExcitabilityGeneticsGlutamate receptorsHomeostasisHomeostatic neuroplasticityImagingMolecular mechanismNeuromuscular junctionNMJPharmacologyPostsynapticPresynapticReadily releasable poolRetrograde signalingSignalingSynaptic homeostasisTranssynaptic

Identifiers

PMID23806804
PMCPMC3830618
OpenAlexW2098341193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.