SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2013
Clinical review: Clinical management of new oral anticoagulants: a structured review with emphasis on the reversal of bleeding complications.
Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Direct Oral Anticoagulant Inhibitors: Mode of Action, Clinical Aspects.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2026Review
- Urgent Reversal of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Critical and Life-Threatening Bleeding: A Multidisciplinary Expert Consensus.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) in refractory haemorrhage for non-haemophiliacs: an eleven-year single-centre experience.BMC hematology · 2018Article
- Emergency Neurological Life Support: Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Neurocritical care · 2017Article
- Hemostasis in Intracranial Hemorrhage.Frontiers in neurology · 2017Review
- In vitro reversal of supratherapeutic rivaroxaban levels with coagulation factor concentrates.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2016Article
- Anticoagulation Reversal and Treatment Strategies in Major Bleeding: Update 2016.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2016Review
- New anticoagulants for the treatment of venous thromboembolism.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2016Review
- Spotlight on idarucizumab and its potential for the reversal of anticoagulant effects of dabigatran.Drug design, development and therapy · 2016Review
- Emergency Neurological Life Support: Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Neurocritical care · 2015Review
- Updates in the perioperative and emergency management of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants.Critical care (London, England) · 2015Article
- Reversal of anticoagulant effects in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
New oral anticoagulants, including dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban, have been recently approved for primary and secondary prophylaxis of thromboembolic conditions. However, there is no clear strategy for managing and reversing their anticoagulant effects. We aimed to summarize the available evidence for clinical management and reversal of bleeding associated with new oral anticoagulants. Using a systematic review approach, we aimed to identify studies describing reversal strategies for dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. The search was conducted using Medline, EMBASE, HealthSTAR, and grey literature. We included laboratory and human studies. We included 23 studies reported in 37 out of 106 potentially relevant references. Four studies were conducted in humans and the rest were in vitro and in vivo studies. The majority of the studies evaluated the use of prothrombinase complex concentrate (PCC), either activated or inactivated, and recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa). Other interventions were also identified. Laboratory studies suggest that hemostatic parameters and bleeding might be partially or completely corrected by PCC for rivaroxaban better than dabigatran. Studies in humans suggest that PCC might reverse the effects of rivaroxaban better than dabigatran assessed by hemostatic tests. We were not able to locate studies evaluating the clinical efficacy of these agents. The best available evidence suggests that PCC (activated or inactivated) might be the best option for reversing new anticoagulants. Evidence for rFVIIa is less compelling. There might be differences in the efficacy of reversing agents for different anticoagulants. Studies assessing the clinical efficacy of these reversal agents are urgently needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.