Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23806094›Full record

Trial reportJournal of health communication2013

Randomized trial of tailored skin cancer prevention for children: the Project SCAPE family study.

Karen Glanz, Alana D Steffen, Elinor Schoenfeld, Karyn A Tappe

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of health communication, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05788939 (DOES PLANNED VISUAL EDUCATION AFFECT UNIVERSITY STUDENTS' ATTITUDES AND BELIEFS ABOUT SKIN CANCER?), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05788939 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Does planned visual education affect university students' attitudes and beliefs about skin cancer?

TypeinterventionalSponsorManisa Celal Bayar UniversityRan2019 to 2019Enrolled116ConditionsSkin NeoplasmArmsPlanned Visual Education Based on Health Belief Model
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Effects of tailored risk communications for skin cancer prevention and detection: the PennSCAPE randomized trial.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2015
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Review of the Impact of Sun Safety Interventions in Children.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2023
    Review
  9. Knowledge Levels of Kindergarten Teachers About Skin Cancer, Sun Protection Behaviors, and Affecting Factors.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [Skin health promotion in the elderly].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2015
    Review
  16. Brazilian consensus on photoprotection.Anais brasileiros de dermatologia
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karen Glanza University of Pennsylvania Schools of Medicine and Nursing , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , USA.
Alana D Steffen
Elinor Schoenfeld
Karyn A Tappe
Stony Brook University · USUniversity of Hawaii System · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

University of Hawaii Cancer Center CCSGP30CA071789 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI Xin Chen · 1996 to 2026
$56.2M
EVALUATION OF TAILORED SKIN CANCER PREVENTION STRATEGIESR01CA076419 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI GLANZ, KAREN · 1998 to 2001
$696k
NCI NIH HHS CA 76419NCI NIH HHS P30 CA071789NCI NIH HHS R01 CA076419
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated a tailored intervention to promote sun protection in parents and their children, hypothesizing that the tailored intervention would lead to improved skin cancer prevention behaviors compared to generic materials. Families were recruited through schools and community centers and were included if there was 1 child in Grades 1-3 at moderate to high risk for skin cancer. Participants were randomized into one of two intervention groups: a tailored intervention, in which they received personalized skin cancer education through the mail; or a control group who received generic skin cancer information materials. Before and after intervention, parents completed questionnaires about their and their children's skin cancer risk and prevention knowledge and behaviors. Parents also completed 4-day sun exposure and protection diaries for their child and themselves. Tailored group participants demonstrated significantly greater positive changes in prevention behavior after the intervention, including children's use of sunscreen, shirts, and hats, and parents' use of shade, and skin examinations. Effect sizes were small and perceived benefits and social norms mediated intervention effects. Findings from this study support the efficacy of focusing tailored communications to families in order to change skin cancer prevention practices in young children.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeChildChild BehaviorChild, PreschoolFemaleHealth CommunicationHealth PromotionHumansMaleParentsProgram EvaluationProtective ClothingRisk AssessmentSkin NeoplasmsSunburnSunscreening Agents

Identifiers

PMID23806094
PMCPMC3815976
OpenAlexW2047307611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.