Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23805973›Full record

ReviewThe Biochemical journal2013

CRISPR interference: a structural perspective.

Judith Reeks, James H Naismith, Malcolm F White

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Biochemical journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. CRISPR/Cas Systems: Biological Basis and Genome Editing Applications.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Review
  2. Future Research Directions on Mycobacterium tuberculosis Proteins.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Classification of CRISPR/Cas system and its application in tomato breeding.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Distribution of CRISPR Types in Fluoroquinolone-ResistantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  14. Functional Identification of theFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. RNA-Targeting CRISPR-Cas Systems and Their Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Origins and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Review

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Judith ReeksBiomedical Sciences Research Complex, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9ST, UK.
James H Naismith
Malcolm F White
Andrews University · US

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G011400/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K000314/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR (cluster of regularly interspaced palindromic repeats) is a prokaryotic adaptive defence system, providing immunity against mobile genetic elements such as viruses. Genomically encoded crRNA (CRISPR RNA) is used by Cas (CRISPR-associated) proteins to target and subsequently degrade nucleic acids of invading entities in a sequence-dependent manner. The process is known as 'interference'. In the present review we cover recent progress on the structural biology of the CRISPR/Cas system, focusing on the Cas proteins and complexes that catalyse crRNA biogenesis and interference. Structural studies have helped in the elucidation of key mechanisms, including the recognition and cleavage of crRNA by the Cas6 and Cas5 proteins, where remarkable diversity at the level of both substrate recognition and catalysis has become apparent. The RNA-binding RAMP (repeat-associated mysterious protein) domain is present in the Cas5, Cas6, Cas7 and Cmr3 protein families and RAMP-like domains are found in Cas2 and Cas10. Structural analysis has also revealed an evolutionary link between the small subunits of the type I and type III-B interference complexes. Future studies of the interference complexes and their constituent components will transform our understanding of the system.

Indexed as

Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidCrystallographyModels, MolecularNucleic Acid ConformationRNA Processing, Post-Transcriptional

Identifiers

PMID23805973
PMCPMC3727216
OpenAlexW2170016724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.