Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23805896›Full record

ReviewGenome biology2013

The plant microbiome.

Thomas R Turner, Euan K James, Philip S Poole

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 463 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
463citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

463 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Root colonization by beneficial rhizobacteria.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

403 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas R Turner
Euan K James
Philip S Poole

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant genomes contribute to the structure and function of the plant microbiome, a key determinant of plant health and productivity. High-throughput technologies are revealing interactions between these complex communities and their hosts in unprecedented detail.

Indexed as

MetagenomeEndophytesMicrobiotaNitrogen FixationPlant ImmunityPlant Root NodulationPlant RootsPlantsRhizosphereSymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID23805896
PMCPMC3706808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.