ArticleBMC genomics2013
Contribution of nucleosome binding preferences and co-occurring DNA sequences to transcription factor binding.
Article in BMC genomics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-analysis of Chromatin Programming by Steroid Receptors.Cell reports · 2019Pooled it
- AP1 Transcription Factor in the Regulation of the Urokinase Plasminogen Activation System.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Regulation of developmentally controlled enhancer activity by extrinsic signals in normal and malignant cells: AP-1 at the centre.Frontiers in epigenetics and epigenomics · 2024Article
- Characterization of sequence determinants of enhancer function using natural genetic variation.eLife · 2022Article
- Batf Pioneers the Reorganization of Chromatin in Developing Effector T Cells via Ets1-Dependent Recruitment of Ctcf.Cell reports · 2019Article
- Local sequence features that influence AP-1Genome research · 2018Article
- AP-1 Transcription Factors and the BAF Complex Mediate Signal-Dependent Enhancer Selection.Molecular cell · 2017Article
- Understanding how long-acting βBritish journal of pharmacology · 2016Review
- An autoregulatory enhancer controls mammary-specific STAT5 functions.Nucleic acids research · 2016Article
- Stress and glucocorticoid receptor transcriptional programming in time and space: Implications for the brain-gut axis.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2016Review
- Methylated Cytosines Mutate to Transcription Factor Binding Sites that Drive Tetrapod Evolution.Genome biology and evolution · 2015Article
- GABPα Binding to Overlapping ETS and CRE DNA Motifs Is Enhanced by CREB1: Custom DNA Microarrays.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2015Article
- Mechanisms of x chromosome dosage compensation.Journal of genomics · 2015Review
- Epigenomics of macrophages.Immunological reviews · 2014Review
- Nucleosome repositioning links DNA (de)methylation and differential CTCF binding during stem cell development.Genome research · 2014Article
- Nucleosomes are enriched at the boundaries of hypomethylated regions (HMRs) in mouse dermal fibroblasts and keratinocytes.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChromatin plays a critical role in regulating transcription factors (TFs) binding to their canonical transcription factor binding sites (TFBS). Recent studies in vertebrates show that many TFs preferentially bind to genomic regions that are well bound by nucleosomes in vitro. Co-occurring secondary motifs sometimes correlated with functional TFBS.
resultsWe used a logistic regression to evaluate how well the propensity for nucleosome binding and co-occurrence of a secondary motif identify which canonical motifs are bound in vivo. We used ChIP-seq data for three transcription factors binding to their canonical motifs: c-Jun binding the AP-1 motif (TGA(C)/(G)TCA), GR (glucocorticoid receptor) binding the GR motif (G-ACA---(T)/(C)GT-C), and Hoxa2 (homeobox a2) binding the Pbx (Pre-B-cell leukemia homeobox) motif (TGATTGAT). For all canonical TFBS in the mouse genome, we calculated intrinsic nucleosome occupancy scores (INOS) for its surrounding 150-bps DNA and examined the relationship with in vivo TF binding. In mouse mammary 3134 cells, c-Jun and GR proteins preferentially bound regions calculated to be well-bound by nucleosomes in vitro with the canonical AP-1 and GR motifs themselves contributing to the high INOS. Functional GR motifs are enriched for AP-1 motifs if they are within a nucleosome-sized 150-bps region. GR and Hoxa2 also bind motifs with low INOS, perhaps indicating a different mechanism of action.
conclusionOur analysis quantified the contribution of INOS and co-occurring sequence to the identification of functional canonical motifs in the genome. This analysis revealed an inherent competition between some TFs and nucleosomes for binding canonical TFBS. GR and c-Jun cooperate if they are within 150-bps. Binding of Hoxa2 and a fraction of GR to motifs with low INOS values suggesting they are not in competition with nucleosomes and may function using different mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.