Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23805387›Full record

ArticleJournal of interventional gastroenterology2012

Indigocarmine added to the water exchange method enhances adenoma detection - a RCT.

Joseph Leung, Surinder Mann, Rodelei Siao-Salera, Catherine Ngo, Randy McCreery, Wilhemina Canete, Felix Leung

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of interventional gastroenterology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01383265 nacompletednot on this map

Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) to Compare Adenoma Detection Rate of Combined Chromoendoscopy (Indigo Carmine) With Water Infusion in Lieu of Air Insufflation (Water Method) vs. Water Method Alone in Screening Colonoscopy

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Northern California Health Care SystemRan2010 to 2013Enrolled1,177ConditionsColon PolypArmsWater method and chromoendoscopy, Water method
NCT01607255 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Efficacy of Water & Indigo Carmine vs Water or Air Method

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2013 to 2017Enrolled480ConditionsColorectal NeoplasmsArmsIndigo carmine, water (exchange) method, water (exchange) plus dye method, air method
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Chromocolonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: Dive into the Big Blue.Journal of interventional gastroenterology · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joseph LeungGastroenterology, Sacramento VA Medical Center, Sacramento ; Gastroenterology, UC Davis Medical Center.
Surinder Mann
Rodelei Siao-Salera
Catherine Ngo
Randy McCreery
Wilhemina Canete
Felix Leung

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeChromoendoscopy with dye spray and the water method both increase adenoma detection. HYPOTHESIS: Adding indigocarmine to the water method will enhance further the effectiveness of the latter in adenoma detection.

methodsScreening colonoscopy was performed with the water method (control) or with 0.008% indigocarmine added (study) by two endoscopists. Randomization was based on computer-generated codes contained in blocks of pre-arranged opaque sealed envelopes. High resolution colonoscopes were used. Upon insertion into the rectum, air was suctioned. With the air pump turned off, water was infused using a blunt needle adaptor connected to the scope channel and a foot pump to facilitate scope insertion until the cecum was reached. Residual stool causing cloudiness was suctioned followed by infusion of clear or colored water (water exchange) to facilitate scope passage with minimal distention of the colonic lumen. Upon seeing the appendix opening under water, water was suctioned and air was insufflated to facilitate inspection on scope withdrawal. STATISTICS: Sample size calculation revealed 168 patients (84/group) needed to be randomized. Study was IRB-approved and registered (NCT01383265).

resultsThere were no significant differences in mean age, gender distribution, BMI, and family history of colon cancer. Cecal intubation success rate was 100% in both groups. The overall adenoma detection rate was 44% (water only) versus 62% (water with indigocarmine), respectively (p=0.03). One cancer was detected in each group.

conclusionIn a RCT, indigocarmine at 0.008% concentration, added to the water method, significantly enhanced further the effectiveness of the latter in detecting adenomas.

Indexed as

adenoma detectioncolon cancer screeningindigocarminewater method

Identifiers

PMID23805387
PMCPMC3655361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.