Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23805272›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Comparison of Genomic and Epigenomic Expression in Monozygotic Twins Discordant for Rett Syndrome.

Kunio Miyake, Chunshu Yang, Yohei Minakuchi, Kenta Ohori, Masaki Soutome, Takae Hirasawa, Yasuhiro Kazuki, Noboru Adachi, Seiko Suzuki, Masayuki Itoh and 7 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readTwin Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Genetic Causes and Modifiers of Autism Spectrum Disorder.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Functional outcomes in Rett syndrome.Brain & development · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kunio MiyakeDepartment of Epigenetic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine and Engineering, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Japan.
Chunshu Yang
Yohei Minakuchi
Kenta Ohori
Masaki Soutome
Takae Hirasawa
Yasuhiro Kazuki
Noboru Adachi
Seiko Suzuki
Masayuki Itoh
Yu-Ichi Goto
Tomoko Andoh
Hiroshi Kurosawa
Mitsuo Oshimura
Masayuki Sasaki
Atsushi Toyoda
Takeo Kubota
University of Yamanashi · JPNational Center of Neurology and Psychiatry · JPKeio University · JPNational Institute of Genetics · JPTottori University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monozygotic (identical) twins have been widely used in genetic studies to determine the relative contributions of heredity and the environment in human diseases. Discordance in disease manifestation between affected monozygotic twins has been attributed to either environmental factors or different patterns of X chromosome inactivation (XCI). However, recent studies have identified genetic and epigenetic differences between monozygotic twins, thereby challenging the accepted experimental model for distinguishing the effects of nature and nurture. Here, we report the genomic and epigenomic sequences in skin fibroblasts of a discordant monozygotic twin pair with Rett syndrome, an X-linked neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by autistic features, epileptic seizures, gait ataxia and stereotypical hand movements. The twins shared the same de novo mutation in exon 4 of the MECP2 gene (G269AfsX288), which was paternal in origin and occurred during spermatogenesis. The XCI patterns in the twins did not differ in lymphocytes, skin fibroblasts, and hair cells (which originate from ectoderm as does neuronal tissue). No reproducible differences were detected between the twins in single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), insertion-deletion polymorphisms (indels), or copy number variations. Differences in DNA methylation between the twins were detected in fibroblasts in the upstream regions of genes involved in brain function and skeletal tissues such as Mohawk Homeobox (MKX), Brain-type Creatine Kinase (CKB), and FYN Tyrosine Kinase Protooncogene (FYN). The level of methylation in these upstream regions was inversely correlated with the level of gene expression. Thus, differences in DNA methylation patterns likely underlie the discordance in Rett phenotypes between the twins.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticChromosomes, Human, XDNADNA Copy Number VariationsDNA MethylationDNA Mutational AnalysisExonsGenome, HumanGenomicsGenotypeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansINDEL MutationMethyl-CpG-Binding Protein 2PhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideDNAMECP2 protein, humanMethyl-CpG-Binding Protein 2

Identifiers

PMID23805272
PMCPMC3689680
OpenAlexW2092457144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.