ArticleFrontiers in psychology2013
Feeling backwards? How temporal order in speech affects the time course of vocal emotion recognition.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Speak or shout? Nonverbal vocalizations promote rapid detection of emotions in vocal communication.PloS one · 2026Article
- The Sound of Emotional Prosody: Nearly 3 Decades of Research and Future Directions.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025Article
- The Reading Everyday Emotion Database (REED): a set of audio-visual recordings of emotions in music and language.Language resources and evaluation · 2025Article
- Article
- The Mandarin Chinese auditory emotions stimulus database: A validated set of Chinese pseudo-sentences.Behavior research methods · 2023Article
- Automaticity in the recognition of nonverbal emotional vocalizations.Emotion (Washington, D.C.) · 2019Article
- Exploring the Effects of Personality Traits on the Perception of Emotions From Prosody.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
- Gender Differences in the Recognition of Vocal Emotions.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- Hot Speech and Exploding Bombs: Autonomic Arousal During Emotion Classification of Prosodic Utterances and Affective Sounds.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- Compensating for age limits through emotional crossmodal integration.Frontiers in psychology · 2015Article
- Cultural differences in on-line sensitivity to emotional voices: comparing East and West.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2015Article
- Expression of emotion in music and vocal communication: Introduction to the research topic.Frontiers in psychology · 2014Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent studies suggest that the time course for recognizing vocal expressions of basic emotion in speech varies significantly by emotion type, implying that listeners uncover acoustic evidence about emotions at different rates in speech (e.g., fear is recognized most quickly whereas happiness and disgust are recognized relatively slowly; Pell and Kotz, 2011). To investigate whether vocal emotion recognition is largely dictated by the amount of time listeners are exposed to speech or the position of critical emotional cues in the utterance, 40 English participants judged the meaning of emotionally-inflected pseudo-utterances presented in a gating paradigm, where utterances were gated as a function of their syllable structure in segments of increasing duration from the end of the utterance (i.e., gated syllable-by-syllable from the offset rather than the onset of the stimulus). Accuracy for detecting six target emotions in each gate condition and the mean identification point for each emotion in milliseconds were analyzed and compared to results from Pell and Kotz (2011). We again found significant emotion-specific differences in the time needed to accurately recognize emotions from speech prosody, and new evidence that utterance-final syllables tended to facilitate listeners' accuracy in many conditions when compared to utterance-initial syllables. The time needed to recognize fear, anger, sadness, and neutral from speech cues was not influenced by how utterances were gated, although happiness and disgust were recognized significantly faster when listeners heard the end of utterances first. Our data provide new clues about the relative time course for recognizing vocally-expressed emotions within the 400-1200 ms time window, while highlighting that emotion recognition from prosody can be shaped by the temporal properties of speech.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.