Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23805057›Full record

ArticleJournal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience2013

An undergraduate laboratory exercise to study sensory inhibition.

Richard H Nguyen, Bryan Kirsch, Roger Yu, Suha Shim, Peter Mangum, Jameson K Holden, Eric M Francisco, Mark Tommerdahl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. An Undergraduate Laboratory Exercise that Demonstrates the Difference Between Peripherally and Centrally Mediated Measures.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Richard H NguyenBiomedical Engineering Department, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599;
Bryan Kirsch
Roger Yu
Suha Shim
Peter Mangum
Jameson K Holden
Eric M Francisco
Mark Tommerdahl

Funding

Sensory based CNS diagnostics for the clinicR21NS072811 · NINDS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI TOMMERDAHL, MARK A · 2011 to 2012
$401k
NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS072811
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory inhibition was first described by von Békésy as a process in which excitation of a field of sensory neurons leads to the reduction of activity of surrounding neurons and thus promotes contrast enhancement of the excited field. In the context of somatosensory cortex, the cortical neurons excited by touch or vibration will suppress excitation of neurons from surrounding receptive fields. USING TACTILE STIMULATORS BOTH DESIGNED AND FABRICATED AT THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL, WE CONDUCTED TWO SIMPLE EXPERIMENTS IN WHICH SENSORY INHIBITION PLAYS A ROLE IN INFORMATION PROCESSING: a unilateral study in which stimuli are delivered to the digits of one hand, and a bilateral study in which stimuli are delivered to the digits of both hands. In the unilateral study, we demonstrated that threshold detection on the third digit (D3) is impacted by conditioning stimuli delivered to adjacent digits 2 (D2) and digits 4 (D4). In the bilateral study, we delivered different conditions of bilateral stimulation in order to investigate the impact that conditioning stimulation of the right hand had on amplitude discriminative capacity of the left hand. The results demonstrated that conditioning stimulation on the right hand had a significant impact on the discriminative capacity of the left hand, and this alteration in discriminative capacity was consistent with previous animal studies in which somatosensory cortical responses evoked by stimulus conditions of unilateral vs. bilateral stimulation were compared. At the conclusion of this exercise, students will appreciate the fundamentals of sensory inhibition as well as the logistics of obtaining and analyzing data from human subjects. This study is designed to help students prepare for studying other facets of sensory processing by providing a firm foundation in the experimental methods and procedures.

Indexed as

Ipsilateral and Bilateral InhibitionSensory InhibitionVibrotactile Amplitude Discrimination

Identifiers

PMID23805057
PMCPMC3692246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.