ArticleProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine2013
Comparison between FEBio and Abaqus for biphasic contact problems.
Article in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A systematic comparison between FEBio and PolyFEM for biomechanical systems.Computer methods and programs in biomedicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Deciphering the "Art" in Modeling and Simulation of the Knee Joint: Overall Strategy.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2019Review
- Poroelastic Modeling of Highly Hydrated Collagen Hydrogels: Experimental Results vs. Numerical Simulation With Custom and Commercial Finite Element Solvers.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2018Article
- FEBio: History and Advances.Annual review of biomedical engineering · 2017Review
- Toward patient-specific articular contact mechanics.Journal of biomechanics · 2015Review
- Computational investigation of the time-dependent contact behaviour of the human tibiofemoral joint under body weight.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine · 2014Article
- A finite element implementation for biphasic contact of hydrated porous media under finite deformation and sliding.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Articular cartilage plays an important role in the function of diarthrodial joints. Computational methods have been used to study the biphasic mechanics of cartilage, and Abaqus has been one of the most widely used commercial software packages for this purpose. A newly developed open-source finite element solver, FEBio, has been developed specifically for biomechanical applications. The aim of this study was to undertake a direct comparison between FEBio and Abaqus for some practical contact problems involving cartilage. Three model types, representing a porous flat-ended indentation test, a spherical-ended indentation test, and a conceptual natural joint contact model, were compared. In addition, a parameter sensitivity study was also performed for the spherical-ended indentation test to investigate the effects of changes in the input material properties on the model outputs, using both FEBio and Abaqus. Excellent agreement was found between FEBio and Abaqus for all of the model types and across the range of material properties that were investigated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.