Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23804544›Full record

Trial reportHippocampus2013

Transitivity performance, relational hierarchy knowledge and awareness: results of an instructional framing manipulation.

Dharshan Kumaran, Hans Ludwig

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Hippocampus, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Agency effects on the binding of event elements in episodic memory.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The binding structure of event elements in episodic memory and the role of animacy.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Memory integration: neural mechanisms and implications for behavior.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2015
    Article
  9. Effects of spatial training on transitive inference performance in humans and rhesus monkeys.Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dharshan KumaranInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, 17 Queen Square, United Kingdom.
Hans Ludwig
Queen Mary University of London · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust WT085189MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transitive inference (TI) paradigm has been widely used to examine the role of the hippocampus in generalization. Here we consider a surprising feature of experimental findings in this task: the relatively poor transitivity performance and levels of hierarchy knowledge achieved by adult human subjects. We focused on the influence of the task instructions on participants' subsequent performance--a single-word framing manipulation which either specified the relation between items as transitive (i.e., OLD-FRAME: choose which item is "older") or left it ambiguous (i.e., NO-FRAME: choose which item is "correct"). We show a marked but highly specific effect of manipulating prior knowledge through instruction: transitivity performance and levels of relational hierarchy knowledge were enhanced, but premise performance unchanged. Further, we show that hierarchy recall accuracy, but not conventional awareness scores, was a significant predictor of inferential performance across the entire group of participants. The current study has four main implications: first, our findings establish the importance of the task instructions, and prior knowledge, in the TI paradigm--suggesting that they influence the size of the overall hypothesis space (e.g., to favor a linear hierarchical structure over other possibilities in the OLD-FRAME). Second, the dissociable effects of the instructional frame on premise and inference performance provide evidence for the operation of distinct underlying mechanisms (i.e., an associative mechanism vs. relational hierarchy knowledge). Third, our findings suggest that a detailed measurement of hierarchy recall accuracy may be a more sensitive index of relational hierarchy knowledge, than conventional awareness score--and should be used in future studies investigating links between awareness and inferential performance. Finally, our study motivates an experimental setting that ensures robust hierarchy learning across participants--therefore facilitating study of the neural mechanisms underlying the learning and representation of linear hierarchies.

Indexed as

Association LearningAwarenessConcept FormationKnowledgeAdolescentAdultAnalysis of VarianceFemaleGeneralization, PsychologicalHumansMaleMental RecallPhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeYoung Adultgeneralizationhippocampusrelational memorytransitive inference

Identifiers

PMID23804544
PMCPMC4030619
OpenAlexW2105022735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.