Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23804400›Full record

ArticleGenome research2013

Functional DNA methylation differences between tissues, cell types, and across individuals discovered using the M&M algorithm.

Bo Zhang, Yan Zhou, Nan Lin, Rebecca F Lowdon, Chibo Hong, Raman P Nagarajan, Jeffrey B Cheng, Daofeng Li, Michael Stevens, Hyung Joo Lee and 23 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 121 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
121citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

121 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 200 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The researcher's guide to selecting biomarkers in mental health studies.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

61 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Bo ZhangDepartment of Genetics, Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63108, USA. bxzhang@nenu.edu.cn
Yan Zhou
Nan Lin
Rebecca F Lowdon
Chibo Hong
Raman P Nagarajan
Jeffrey B Cheng
Daofeng Li
Michael Stevens
Hyung Joo Lee
Xiaoyun Xing
Jia Zhou
Vasavi Sundaram
Ginell Elliott
Junchen Gu
Taoping Shi
Philippe Gascard
Mahvash Sigaroudinia
Thea D Tlsty
Theresa Kadlecek
Arthur Weiss
Henriette O'Geen
Peggy J Farnham
Cécile L Maire
Keith L Ligon
Pamela A F Madden
Angela Tam
Richard Moore
Martin Hirst
Marco A Marra
Baoxue Zhang
Joseph F Costello
Ting Wang
Washington University in St. Louis · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USBC Cancer Agency · CABrigham and Women's Hospital · USHarbin University of Science and Technology · CNHarvard University · USNortheast Normal University · CNUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Transgenic Mouse and Biobank CoreP01CA095616 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI DEPINHO, RONALD ANTHONY · 2003 to 2012
$20.3M
Integrated Epigenetic Maps of Human Embryonic and Adult CellsU01ES017154 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI COSTELLO, JOSEPH F, MARRA, MARCO ANTONIO · 2008 to 2012
$11.6M
Therapeutic Opportunities for Pediatric AstrocytomaP01CA142536 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI SEGAL, ROSALIND A. · 2011 to 2015
$7.9M
MOLECULAR ONCOLOGY TRAINING GRANTT32CA113275 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Matthew J Walter · 2006 to 2026
$5.7M
RESEARCH EDUCATION PROGRAM ON COMPUTATIONAL AND STATISTICAL TOOL DEVELOPMENT FOR ADDICTION GENETICSR25DA027995 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MADDEN, PAMELA ANN, RICE, JOHN P. · 2009 to 2019
$4.3M
Training At The Interface of Psychology, Neuroscience, and GeneticsT32GM081739 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BARCH, DEANNA · 2007 to 2016
$2.1M
PATERNAL OPIOID EXPOSURE IMPARTS BIOBEHAVIORAL DEFICITS IN THEIR OFFSPRINGR01DA030461 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CICERO, THEODORE J · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
Tissue and Pathology CoreP50CA134254 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GOODFELLOW, PAUL JOSEPH, MUTCH, DAVID G · 2009 to 2011
$1.7M
ADVANCED EPI/GENOME BROWSER WITH ENHANCED VISUALIZATION AND ANALYSIS TOOLSR01HG007354 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, TING · 2013 to 2016
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA095616NCI NIH HHS P01CA095616NCI NIH HHS P01 CA142536NCI NIH HHS P50 CA134254NCI NIH HHS P50CA134254NCI NIH HHS T32 CA113275NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG007354NHGRI NIH HHS R01HG007354NIDA NIH HHS DA027995NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA030461NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA027995NIEHS NIH HHS 5U01ES017154NIEHS NIH HHS U01 ES017154NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM081739
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA methylation plays key roles in diverse biological processes such as X chromosome inactivation, transposable element repression, genomic imprinting, and tissue-specific gene expression. Sequencing-based DNA methylation profiling provides an unprecedented opportunity to map and compare complete DNA methylomes. This includes one of the most widely applied technologies for measuring DNA methylation: methylated DNA immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (MeDIP-seq), coupled with a complementary method, methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme sequencing (MRE-seq). A computational approach that integrates data from these two different but complementary assays and predicts methylation differences between samples has been unavailable. Here, we present a novel integrative statistical framework M&M (for integration of MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq) that dynamically scales, normalizes, and combines MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq data to detect differentially methylated regions. Using sample-matched whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) as a gold standard, we demonstrate superior accuracy and reproducibility of M&M compared to existing analytical methods for MeDIP-seq data alone. M&M leverages the complementary nature of MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq data to allow rapid comparative analysis between whole methylomes at a fraction of the cost of WGBS. Comprehensive analysis of nineteen human DNA methylomes with M&M reveals distinct DNA methylation patterns among different tissue types, cell types, and individuals, potentially underscoring divergent epigenetic regulation at different scales of phenotypic diversity. We find that differential DNA methylation at enhancer elements, with concurrent changes in histone modifications and transcription factor binding, is common at the cell, tissue, and individual levels, whereas promoter methylation is more prominent in reinforcing fundamental tissue identities.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDNA MethylationGenome, HumanData Interpretation, StatisticalHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansOrgan SpecificitySequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID23804400
PMCPMC3759728
OpenAlexW2103990329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.