Trial reportJournal of human hypertension2013
Efficacy of newer versus older antihypertensive drugs in black patients living in sub-Saharan Africa.
Trial report in Journal of human hypertension, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01030458 (Newer vs Older Antihypertensive Agents in African Hypertensive Patients Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Newer vs Older Antihypertensive Agents in African Hypertensive Patients Trial
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacotherapy for hypertension in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMC medicine · 2020Pooled it
- The benefits of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers combined with calcium channel blockers on metabolic, renal, and cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients: a meta-analysis.International urology and nephrology · 2018Pooled it
- Heart rate variability on antihypertensive drugs in black patients living in sub-Saharan Africa.Blood pressure · 2014Trial
- Hypertension in Sub-Saharan Africa: Burden, Barriers and Priorities for Improving Treatment Outcomes.Circulation research · 2025Review
- The state of hypertension in Africa: Insights into hypertension in Gambia.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2024Article
- Blood pressure and the hypertension care cascade in The Gambia: Findings from a nationwide survey.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2024Article
- Fixed-dose combination therapy-based protocol compared with free pill combination protocol: Results of a cluster randomized trial.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2023Article
- Urinary proteomics combined with home blood pressure telemonitoring for health care reform trial: rational and protocol.Blood pressure · 2021Article
- Article
- Office and Home Blood Pressures as Determinants of Electrocardiographic Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Among Black Nigerians Compared With White Flemish.American journal of hypertension · 2017Article
- Nigerian Population Research on Environment, Gene and Health (NIPREGH) - objectives and protocol.Journal of biomedical research · 2014Article
- Challenge for hypertension prevention and control worldwide: the time for action.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 11 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To address the epidemic of hypertension in blacks born and living in sub-Saharan Africa, we compared in a randomised clinical trial (NCT01030458) single-pill combinations of old and new antihypertensive drugs in patients (30-69 years) with uncomplicated hypertension (140-179/90-109 mm Hg). After ≥4 weeks off treatment, 183 of 294 screened patients were assigned to once daily bisoprolol/hydrochlorothiazide 5/6.25 mg (n=89; R) or amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg (n=94; E) and followed up for 6 months. To control blood pressure (<140/<90 mm Hg), bisoprolol and amlodipine could be doubled (10 mg per day) and α-methyldopa (0.5-2 g per day) added. Sitting blood pressure fell by 19.5/12.0 mm Hg in R patients and by 24.8/13.2 mm Hg in E patients and heart rate decreased by 9.7 beats per minute in R patients with no change in E patients (-0.2 beats per minute). The between-group differences (R minus E) were 5.2 mm Hg (P<0.0001) systolic, 1.3 mm Hg (P=0.12) diastolic, and 9.6 beats per minute (P<0.0001). In 57 R and 67 E patients with data available at all visits, these estimates were 5.5 mm Hg (P<0.0001) systolic, 1.8 mm Hg (P=0.07) diastolic and 9.8 beats per minute (P<0.0001). In R compared with E patients, 45 vs 37% (P=0.13) proceeded to the higher dose of randomised treatment and 33 vs 9% (P<0.0001) had α-methyldopa added. There were no between-group differences in symptoms except for ankle oedema in E patients (P=0.012). In conclusion, new compared with old drugs lowered systolic blood pressure more and therefore controlled hypertension better in native African black patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.