Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23802927›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association2013

Promoting heart health in rural women.

Pamela Stewart Fahs, Margaret Pribulick, Ishan Canty Williams, Gary D James, Virginia Rovnyak, Virginia Rovynak, Susan M Seibold-Simpson

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Rural physical activity interventions in the United States: a systematic review and RE-AIM evaluation.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Investigating Relationships Between Hypertension, Sleep, and Cognitive Risk in an Underserved Community.Online journal of rural nursing and health care : the official journal of the Rural Nurse Organization · 2020
    Article
  12. Effects of the Strong Hearts, Healthy Communities Intervention on Functional Fitness of Rural Women.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. An Appalachian Perspective of Alzheimer's Disease: A Rural Health Nurse Opportunity.Online journal of rural nursing and health care : the official journal of the Rural Nurse Organization · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Do Modifiable Cardiovascular Risk Factors Differ By Rural Classification in Women Who Enroll in a Weight Loss Intervention?Online journal of rural nursing and health care : the official journal of the Rural Nurse Organization
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Rovynak, Virginia [corrected to Rovnyak, Virginia]
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pamela Stewart FahsDecker School of Nursing, Binghamton University, State University of New York, Binghamton, New York 13902-6000, USA. psfahs@binghamton.edu
Margaret Pribulick
Ishan Canty Williams
Gary D James
Virginia Rovnyak
Virginia Rovynak
Susan M Seibold-Simpson
Binghamton University · USUniversity of Virginia · USNorwich University Applied Research Institute · US

Funding

Promoting Heart Health in Rural WomenR15NR009218 · NINR · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NY,BINGHAMTON · PI STEWART FAHS, PAMELA S · 2006 to 2006
$209k
NINR NIH HHS 1R15NR009218-01ANINR NIH HHS R15 NR009218
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare 2 strategies, stage-matched nursing and community intervention (SMN+CI) and community intervention (CI) alone in changing cardiovascular risk factors in up to 3 behavioral areas: diet, physical activity, and/or smoking among rural women.

methodsA 14-month, multisite randomized controlled trial of 117 rural women was conducted. Transtheoretical model was used in identification of stage of change and development of the SMN+CI nursing interventions. A social-ecological model was used to address issues of rurality in the development of interventions.

findingsThe SMN + CI group was superior on 4 outcomes. There were significant increases in 2 measures of dietary intake; improvement in dietary stage of change for fruits and vegetables; and reduced diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in the SMN + CI group. After log transformation DBP significance was lost. The CI group had a significant reduction in change in total cholesterol; however, significance was lost after control for the initiation of lipid lowering medications. There was a significant reduction in Framingham risk scores pre- to postintervention, regardless of group.

conclusionsThere continues to be a need to improve cardiovascular risk factors in rural women. There should be an exploration of whether intensified dose and fidelity of the intervention strategies of diet and physical activity are effective in improving anthropometric and laboratory values. Further investigation is warranted into factors influencing the pre- to postreduction in Framingham risk scores.

Indexed as

Rural PopulationAdultCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleHealth PromotionHealth SurveysHumansMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalRisk Reduction BehaviorUnited States

Identifiers

PMID23802927
PMCPMC3695442
OpenAlexW2145110641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.