ArticleBMC bioinformatics2013
Integrative relational machine-learning for understanding drug side-effect profiles.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integration of artificial intelligence applications in clinical pharmacy services: A scoping review.Future healthcare journal · 2026Review
- DeepADR: multimodal prediction of adverse drug reaction frequency by integrating early-stage drug discovery information via Kolmogorov-Arnold networks.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- A scoping review of artificial intelligence applications in clinical trial risk assessment.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in the field of pharmacy practice: A literature review.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023Review
- An extensive survey on the use of supervised machine learning techniques in the past two decades for prediction of drug side effects.Artificial intelligence review · 2023Article
- Graph generative and adversarial strategy-enhanced node feature learning and self-calibrated pairwise attribute encoding for prediction of drug-related side effects.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- What are side effects?European journal for philosophy of science · 2023Article
- Decoding kinase-adverse event associations for small molecule kinase inhibitors.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Drug Treatment Effect Model Based on MODWT and Hawkes Self-Exciting Point Process.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- An introduction to machine learning and analysis of its use in rheumatic diseases.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2021Review
- Investigating ADR mechanisms with Explainable AI: a feasibility study with knowledge graph mining.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Article
- Predicting the frequencies of drug side effects.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Drug repurposing to improve treatment of rheumatic autoimmune inflammatory diseases.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2020Review
- Predicting serious rare adverse reactions of novel chemicals.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- Drug Repurposing by Simulating Flow Through Protein-Protein Interaction Networks.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2018Article
- Knowledge graph prediction of unknown adverse drug reactions and validation in electronic health records.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Large-scale identification of adverse drug reaction-related proteins through a random walk model.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Predicting drug side effects by multi-label learning and ensemble learning.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Article
- Artificial intelligence in clinical pharmacy-A systematic review of current scenario and future perspectives.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDrug side effects represent a common reason for stopping drug development during clinical trials. Improving our ability to understand drug side effects is necessary to reduce attrition rates during drug development as well as the risk of discovering novel side effects in available drugs. Today, most investigations deal with isolated side effects and overlook possible redundancy and their frequent co-occurrence.
resultsIn this work, drug annotations are collected from SIDER and DrugBank databases. Terms describing individual side effects reported in SIDER are clustered with a semantic similarity measure into term clusters (TCs). Maximal frequent itemsets are extracted from the resulting drug x TC binary table, leading to the identification of what we call side-effect profiles (SEPs). A SEP is defined as the longest combination of TCs which are shared by a significant number of drugs. Frequent SEPs are explored on the basis of integrated drug and target descriptors using two machine learning methods: decision-trees and inductive-logic programming. Although both methods yield explicit models, inductive-logic programming method performs relational learning and is able to exploit not only drug properties but also background knowledge. Learning efficiency is evaluated by cross-validation and direct testing with new molecules. Comparison of the two machine-learning methods shows that the inductive-logic-programming method displays a greater sensitivity than decision trees and successfully exploit background knowledge such as functional annotations and pathways of drug targets, thereby producing rich and expressive rules. All models and theories are available on a dedicated web site.
conclusionsSide effect profiles covering significant number of drugs have been extracted from a drug ×side-effect association table. Integration of background knowledge concerning both chemical and biological spaces has been combined with a relational learning method for discovering rules which explicitly characterize drug-SEP associations. These rules are successfully used for predicting SEPs associated with new drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.