Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23801763›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2013

Orally fed seeds producing designer IgAs protect weaned piglets against enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli infection.

Vikram Virdi, Annelies Coddens, Sylvie De Buck, Sam Millet, Bruno Maria Goddeeris, Eric Cox, Henri De Greve, Ann Depicker

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review on Preventive Measures to Reduce Post-Weaning Diarrhoea in Piglets.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  17. Orally active bivalent ViScience · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vikram VirdiDepartment of Plant Systems Biology, Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie, 9052 Ghent, Belgium. vikram.virdi@psb.vib-ugent.be
Annelies Coddens
Sylvie De Buck
Sam Millet
Bruno Maria Goddeeris
Eric Cox
Henri De Greve
Ann Depicker
Ghent University · BEVlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie · BEVIB-VUB Center for Structural Biology · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral feed-based passive immunization can be a promising strategy to prolong maternal lactogenic immunity against postweaning infections. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC)-caused postweaning diarrhea in piglets is one such infection that may be prevented by oral passive immunization and might avert recurrent economic losses to the pig farming industry. As a proof of principle, we designed anti-ETEC antibodies by fusing variable domains of llama heavy chain-only antibodies (VHHs) against ETEC to the Fc part of a porcine immunoglobulin (IgG or IgA) and expressed them in Arabidopsis thaliana seeds. In this way, four VHH-IgG and four VHH-IgA antibodies were produced to levels of about 3% and 0.2% of seed weight, respectively. Cotransformation of VHH-IgA with the porcine joining chain and secretory component led to the production of light-chain devoid, assembled multivalent dimeric, and secretory IgA-like antibodies. In vitro analysis of all of the antibody-producing seed extracts showed inhibition of bacterial binding to porcine gut villous enterocytes. However, in the piglet feed-challenge experiment, only the piglets receiving feed containing the VHH-IgA-based antibodies (dose 20 mg/d per pig) were protected. Piglets receiving the VHH-IgA-based antibodies in the feed showed a progressive decline in shedding of bacteria, significantly lower immune responses corroborating reduced exposure to the ETEC pathogen, and a significantly higher weight gain compared with the piglets receiving VHH-IgG producing (dose 80 mg/d per pig) or wild-type seeds. These results stress the importance of the antibody format in oral passive immunization and encourage future expression of these antibodies in crop seeds.

Indexed as

Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coliAdministration, OralAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialArabidopsisBase SequenceEnterocytesEscherichia coli InfectionsImmunization, PassiveImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GMolecular Sequence DataSeedsSequence Analysis, DNASwineSwine DiseasesAntibodies, BacterialImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin Gantibiotic replacemententeric infectionsmolecular farmingmucosal immunitynanobody

Identifiers

PMID23801763
PMCPMC3718133
OpenAlexW2004296041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.