Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23801665›Full record

ArticleWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology

Comparisons of the embryonic development of Drosophila, Nasonia, and Tribolium.

Ezzat El-Sherif, Jeremy A Lynch, Susan J Brown

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Building the parasitic waspFrontiers in insect science · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Embryogenesis in Myrmicine Ants Combines Features of Short Germ-Band Development With a Progressive Mode of Segmentation.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. From Egg to Adult: A Developmental Table of the Ant Monomorium pharaonis.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Evolutionary Change in Gut Specification inJournal of developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Early embryonic development of Bombyx.Development genes and evolution · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ezzat El-Sherif *Program of Genetics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas.
Jeremy A Lynch *Institute for Developmental Biology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Susan J BrownDivision of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas sjbrown@ksu.edu.

Funding

Mentoring CoreP20GM103418 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI John A Stanford · 2012 to 2026
$63.0M
GENETIC CONTROL OF SEGMENTATIONR01HD029594 · NICHD · KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BROWN, SUSAN J. · 1992 to 2011
$3.4M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD029594NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studying the embryogenesis of diverse insect species is crucial to understanding insect evolution. Here, we review current advances in understanding the development of two emerging model organisms: the wasp Nasonia vitripennis and the beetle Tribolium castaneum in comparison with the well-studied fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Although Nasonia represents the most basally branching order of holometabolous insects, it employs a derived long germband mode of embryogenesis, more like that of Drosophila, whereas Tribolium undergoes an intermediate germband mode of embryogenesis, which is more similar to the ancestral mechanism. Comparing the embryonic development and genetic regulation of early patterning events in these three insects has given invaluable insights into insect evolution. The similar mode of embryogenesis of Drosophila and Nasonia is reflected in their reliance on maternal morphogenetic gradients. However, they employ different genes as maternal factors, reflecting the evolutionary distance separating them. Tribolium, on the other hand, relies heavily on self-regulatory mechanisms other than maternal cues, reflecting its sequential nature of segmentation and the need for reiterated patterning.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrosophilaEmbryo, NonmammalianGastrulationGerm LayersGTPase-Activating ProteinsHomeodomain ProteinsInsectaMorphogenesisTriboliumTwist-Related Protein 1GTPase-Activating ProteinsHomeodomain ProteinsTwist-Related Protein 1

Identifiers

PMID23801665
PMCPMC5323069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.