ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2013
SUVmax of 2.5 should not be embraced as a magic threshold for separating benign from malignant lesions.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence and Significance of Incidental PET/CT Findings of Cancer Detected in Patients Evaluated for Their Primary Hematologic Malignancy: A Systematic Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Pooled it
- Spleens With Disseminated Lymphoma Exhibit Higher Standardized Uptake Value Maximum, Metabolic Tumor Volumes, and Total Lesion Glycolysis on Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography.Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association · 2026Article
- IntegratedEJNMMI research · 2026Article
- Decoding Uncertainty Quantification for Oncology-An Illustration Using Radiomics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparison ofEJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- Predictive Value of Preoperative Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Challenging the significance of SUV-based parameters in a large-scale retrospective study on lung lesions.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024Article
- What do we know About the Usefulness ofMycopathologia · 2024Article
- Automated detection, delineation and quantification of whole-body bone metastasis using FDG-PET/CT images.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2023Article
- Current imaging methods for assessing Graves` orbitopathy activity with particular emphasis on FDG-PET.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
- Editorial: Case reports in PET imaging.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Critical role of PET/CT-based novel quantitative techniques for assessing global disease activity in multiple myeloma and other hematological malignancies: why it is time to abandon reliance on examining focal lesions.European radiology · 2021Article
- Prognostic Value of Dual-Time-PointDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Evaluation of a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm for low-count clinicalEJNMMI physics · 2019Article
- Imaging for Target Delineation and Treatment Planning in Radiation Oncology: Current and Emerging Techniques.Hematology/oncology clinics of North America · 2019Review
- Advantages ofPathology oncology research : POR · 2019Article
- The kinetics ofEJNMMI research · 2018Article
- Correction for Partial Volume Effect Is a Must, Not a Luxury, to Fully Exploit the Potential of Quantitative PET Imaging in Clinical Oncology.Molecular imaging and biology · 2018Article
- The predictive value ofRadiation oncology (London, England) · 2017Article
- 18F-FDG PET/CT assessment of histopathologically confirmed mediastinal lymph nodes in non-small cell lung cancer using a penalised likelihood reconstruction.European radiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23801170What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.