ArticleSurgery today2014
Liver resection with concomitant inferior vena cava resection: experiences without veno-venous bypass.
Article in Surgery today, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Left hepatectomy extended to paracaval segment and anterior vena cava wall, with autologous venous graft reconstruction of middle hepatic vein under veno-venous bypass and "in situ" hypothermic liver perfusion: a surgical technique.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Article
- Angioplasty of the inferior vena cava with a bovine pericardial patch by the modified open-chest dorsal approach for Budd-Chiari syndrome: A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2023Article
- Review
- Single-Centre Experience of Supra-Renal Vena Cava Resection and Reconstruction.World journal of surgery · 2021Article
- Outcomes of surgical resection and loco-regional therapy in patients with stage 3A hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective review from the national cancer database.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2015Article
- Evolution of surgical microwave ablation for the treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastasis: review of the literature and a single centre experience.Surgery today · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLiver resection offers the chance of a cure for liver cancer. However, when extended hepatectomies were performed in combination with resection of the inferior vena cava (IVC), the procedures were reported to have a surgical mortality rate in excess of 5 %. While most of these operations were performed with the use of veno-venous bypass, this study presents our experience performing the procedure without the bypass.
methodsData were collected from a prospectively maintained database. A retrospective evaluation of a consecutive series of concomitant IVC and liver resections was performed.
resultsFive hundred and seventy-five liver resections were performed between June 2008 and November 2011. Eleven patients (1.9 %) underwent concomitant IVC and liver resections. One patient required segmental IVC replacement, and four IVC defects were closed using a bovine pericardial patch without bypass. Only one patient had histologically confirmed IVC invasion. There was no postoperative mortality. Nine postoperative complications occurred in five patients. No complications in terms of IVC patency were seen. Five patients had disease recurrence, one of whom died within 12 months of surgery.
conclusionConcomitant liver and IVC resection is safe without using a bypass procedure, with acceptable short-term results. Meticulous technique, careful patient selection and a specialized anesthetic team are key to obtaining low postoperative morbidity and mortality rates and an acceptable oncological outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.