Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23800935›Full record

ArticleJAMA2013

Use of advanced treatment technologies among men at low risk of dying from prostate cancer.

Bruce L Jacobs, Yun Zhang, Florian R Schroeck, Ted A Skolarus, John T Wei, James E Montie, Scott M Gilbert, Seth A Strope, Rodney L Dunn, David C Miller and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
18.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 141 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bruce L JacobsDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2800, USA.
Yun Zhang
Florian R Schroeck
Ted A Skolarus
John T Wei
James E Montie
Scott M Gilbert
Seth A Strope
Rodney L Dunn
David C Miller
Brent K Hollenbeck
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Florida · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesKL2TR000450 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$8.8M
Uro Translational Research and Clinical Research Training (UroTRACT)T32DK007782 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WEI, JOHN T · 2000 to 2019
$2.9M
Impact of Urologist Practice Structure on Prostate Cancer CareR01CA168691 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI HOLLENBECK, BRENT K., SHAHINIAN, VAHAKN B · 2013 to 2016
$1.6M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000450NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NCI NIH HHS R01 CA168691NCI NIH HHS R01-CA-168691-01NIDDK NIH HHS 5 T32 DK007782-12NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007782
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceThe use of advanced treatment technologies (ie, intensity-modulated radiotherapy [IMRT] and robotic prostatectomy) for prostate cancer is increasing. The extent to which these advanced treatment technologies have disseminated among patients at low risk of dying from prostate cancer is uncertain.

objectiveTo assess the use of advanced treatment technologies, compared with prior standards (ie, traditional external beam radiation treatment [EBRT] and open radical prostatectomy) and observation, among men with a low risk of dying from prostate cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data, we identified a retrospective cohort of men diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2004 and 2009 who underwent IMRT (n = 23,633), EBRT (n = 3926), robotic prostatectomy (n = 5881), open radical prostatectomy (n = 6123), or observation (n = 16,384). Follow-up data were available through December 31, 2010. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The use of advanced treatment technologies among men unlikely to die from prostate cancer, as assessed by low-risk disease (clinical stage ≤T2a, biopsy Gleason score ≤6, and prostate-specific antigen level ≤10 ng/mL), high risk of noncancer mortality (based on the predicted probability of death within 10 years in the absence of a cancer diagnosis), or both.

resultsIn our cohort, the use of advanced treatment technologies increased from 32% (95% CI, 30%-33%) to 44% (95% CI, 43%-46%) among men with low-risk disease (P < .001) and from 36% (95% CI, 35%-38%) to 57% (95% CI, 55%-59%) among men with high risk of noncancer mortality (P < .001). The use of these advanced treatment technologies among men with both low-risk disease and high risk of noncancer mortality increased from 25% (95% CI, 23%-28%) to 34% (95% CI, 31%-37%) (P < .001). Among all patients diagnosed in SEER, the use of advanced treatment technologies for men unlikely to die from prostate cancer increased from 13% (95% CI, 12%-14%), or 129.2 per 1000 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer, to 24% (95% CI, 24%-25%), or 244.2 per 1000 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer (P < .001). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Among men diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2004 and 2009 who had low-risk disease, high risk of noncancer mortality, or both, the use of advanced treatment technologies has increased.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesHumansLife ExpectancyMaleMedicareMortalityPrognosisProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRetrospective StudiesRiskSEER ProgramUnited States

Identifiers

PMID23800935
PMCPMC3857348
OpenAlexW2103508191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.