ArticleBMC health services research2013
Patient preference for involvement, experienced involvement, decisional conflict, and satisfaction with physician: a structural equation model test.
Article in BMC health services research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Patients and investigators prefer measures of absolute risk in subgroups for pragmatic randomized trials.Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2018Pooled it
- Use of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc) in intervention studies-A systematic review.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- Family Caregiver Communication and Perceptions of Involvement in Hospice Care.Journal of palliative medicine · 2024Trial
- Treatment decisions after interdisciplinary evaluation for nonarthritic hip pain: A randomized controlled trial.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2022Trial
- Shared decision-making in mental health care using routine outcome monitoring: results of a cluster randomised-controlled trial.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2019Trial
- A digital intake approach in specialized mental health care: study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial.BMC psychiatry · 2017Trial
- Associations Between Parenting Stress, Family Support, Emotion Regulation, and Parental Burnout in Parents of Adolescents with Mood Disorders: A Cross-Sectional Structural Equation Modeling and Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis Study.Psychology research and behavior management · 2026Article
- What Patients Don't Say and Physicians Don't Ask: A Needs Assessment in Myasthenia Gravis Integrating Patient and Healthcare Professional Perspectives.Neurology and therapy · 2025Article
- Patient-Centred Preferences for Autonomy and Information-Seeking Among Periodontal Patients in Dental Decision Making.Journal of clinical periodontology · 2025Article
- Using Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint Approach to Facilitate Shared Decision-Making in Osteoarthritis Management: A Patient Perception Study.Arthritis care & research · 2025Article
- Characterizing Decision-Making Surrounding Exercise in ARVC: Analysis of Decisional Conflict, Decisional Regret, and Shared Decision-Making.Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2023Article
- Shared decision-making in physiotherapy: a cross-sectional study of patient involvement factors and issues in Japan.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- Factors influencing the implementation of shared decision-making in breast cancer care: protocol for a mixed-methods study.BMJ open · 2023Article
- When attitudes and beliefs get in the way of shared decision-making: A mediation analysis of participation preference.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Article
- Use of Patient-Reported Data within the Acute Healthcare Context: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Psychometric Properties of the 9-Item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9): Validation of the Italian Version in a Large Psychiatric Clinical Sample.Clinical neuropsychiatry · 2022Article
- Psychological predictors of medical residents' perspectives on shared decision-making with patients: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2020Article
- Article
- Decision coaching using a patient decision aid for youth and parents considering insulin delivery methods for type 1 diabetes: a pre/post study.BMC pediatrics · 2020Article
- Combining Direct and Indirect Measurements to Assess Patients' Satisfaction with the Quality of Public Health Services in Romania: Uncovering Structural Mechanisms and Their Implications.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA comprehensive model of the relationships among different shared decision-making related constructs and their effects on patient-relevant outcomes is largely missing. Objective of our study was the development of a model linking decision-making in medical encounters to an intermediate and a long-term endpoint. The following hypotheses were tested: physicians are more likely to involve patients who have a preference for participation and are willing to take responsibility in the medical decision-making process, increased patient involvement decreases decisional conflict, and lower decisional conflict favourably influences patient satisfaction with the physician.
methodsThis model was tested in a German primary care sample (N = 1,913). Psychometrically tested instruments were administered to assess the following: patients' preference for being involved in medical decision-making, patients' experienced involvement in medical decision-making, decisional conflict, and satisfaction with the primary care provider. Structural equation modelling was used to explore multiple associations. The model was tested and adjusted in a development sub-sample and cross-validated in a confirmatory sample. Demographic and clinical characteristics were accounted for as possible confounders.
resultsLocal and global indexes suggested an acceptable fit between the theoretical model and the data. Increased patient involvement was strongly associated with decreased decisional conflict (standardised regression coefficient Β = -.73). Both high experienced involvement (Β = .34) and low decisional conflict (B = -.28) predicted higher satisfaction with the physician. Patients' preference for involvement was negatively associated with the experienced involvement (B = -.24).
conclusionAltogether, our model could be largely corroborated by the collected empirical data except the unexpected negative association between preference for involvement and experienced involvement. Future research on the associations among different SDM-related constructs should incorporate longitudinal studies in order to strengthen the hypothesis of causal associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.