Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23800355›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2013

Rationale and design of the Multicenter Medication Reconciliation Quality Improvement Study (MARQUIS).

Amanda H Salanitro, Sunil Kripalani, Joanne Resnic, Stephanie K Mueller, Tosha B Wetterneck, Katherine Taylor Haynes, Jason Stein, Peter J Kaboli, Stephanie Labonville, Edward Etchells and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01337063 (Multi-Center Medication Reconciliation Quality Improvement Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01337063 nacompletednot on this map

Multi-Center Medication Reconciliation Quality Improvement Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrigham and Women's HospitalRan2011 to 2014Enrolled1,836ConditionsAdverse Drug Events, Medication Administered in ErrorArmsMentored medication reconciliation quality improvement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Implementation and sustainability of a medication reconciliation toolkit: A mixed methods evaluation.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2020
    Observational
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Higher accuracy of complex medication reconciliation through improved design of electronic tools.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Automated Communication Tools and Computer-Based Medication Reconciliation to Decrease Hospital Discharge Medication Errors.American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Amanda H SalanitroGeriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN, USA. Amanda.Salanitro@Vanderbilt.Edu
Sunil Kripalani
Joanne Resnic
Stephanie K Mueller
Tosha B Wetterneck
Katherine Taylor Haynes
Jason Stein
Peter J Kaboli
Stephanie Labonville
Edward Etchells
Daniel J Cobaugh
David Hanson
Jeffrey L Greenwald
Mark V Williams
Jeffrey L Schnipper

Funding

Multi-Center Medication Reconciliation Quality Improvement Study - MARQUISR18HS019598 · AHRQ · SOCIETY OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE · PI SCHNIPPER, JEFFREY LAWRENCE · 2010 to 2012
$1.5M
AHRQ HHS R18HS019598-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnresolved medication discrepancies during hospitalization can contribute to adverse drug events, resulting in patient harm. Discrepancies can be reduced by performing medication reconciliation; however, effective implementation of medication reconciliation has proven to be challenging. The goals of the Multi-Center Medication Reconciliation Quality Improvement Study (MARQUIS) are to operationalize best practices for inpatient medication reconciliation, test their effect on potentially harmful unintentional medication discrepancies, and understand barriers and facilitators of successful implementation.

methodsSix U.S. hospitals are participating in this quality improvement mentored implementation study. Each hospital has collected baseline data on the primary outcome: the number of potentially harmful unintentional medication discrepancies per patient, as determined by a trained on-site pharmacist taking a "gold standard" medication history. With the guidance of their mentors, each site has also begun to implement one or more of 11 best practices to improve medication reconciliation. To understand the effect of the implemented interventions on hospital staff and culture, we are performing mixed methods program evaluation including surveys, interviews, and focus groups of front line staff and hospital leaders. DISCUSSION: At baseline the number of unintentional medication discrepancies in admission and discharge orders per patient varies by site from 2.35 to 4.67 (mean=3.35). Most discrepancies are due to history errors (mean 2.12 per patient) as opposed to reconciliation errors (mean 1.23 per patient). Potentially harmful medication discrepancies averages 0.45 per patient and varies by site from 0.13 to 0.82 per patient. We discuss several barriers to implementation encountered thus far. In the end, we anticipate that MARQUIS tools and lessons learned have the potential to decrease medication discrepancies and improve patient outcomes.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01337063.

Indexed as

Medication ReconciliationQuality ImprovementBenchmarkingHumansInservice TrainingMedical Staff, HospitalMedication ErrorsOrganizational CulturePharmacistsProcess Assessment, Health CareResearch DesignSafety ManagementTime FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID23800355
PMCPMC3698100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.