ArticleBMC bioinformatics2013
Prediction of gene-phenotype associations in humans, mice, and plants using phenologs.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Caenorhabditis elegans as an experimental model for resilience-boosting microbiota interventions in nonmodel ectotherms.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2026Review
- The cardiac blood transcriptome predicts de novo onset of atrial fibrillation in heart failure.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus · 2024Article
- The Monarch Initiative in 2024: an analytic platform integrating phenotypes, genes and diseases across species.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Phenotypic screening models for rapid diagnosis of genetic variants and discovery of personalized therapeutics.Molecular aspects of medicine · 2023Review
- Use ofHeliyon · 2023Article
- Humanized yeast to model human biology, disease and evolution.Disease models & mechanisms · 2022Review
- Article
- Transcriptomic investigation reveals toxic damage due to tilmicosin and potential resistance against tilmicosin in primary chicken myocardial cells.Poultry science · 2020Article
- Integration of anatomy ontology data with protein-protein interaction networks improves the candidate gene prediction accuracy for anatomical entities.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Plant Biosystems Design Research Roadmap 1.0.Biodesign research · 2020Review
- Automated Methods Enable Direct Computation on Phenotypic Descriptions for Novel Candidate Gene Prediction.Frontiers in plant science · 2019Article
- From phenologs to silent suppressors: Identifying potential therapeutic targets for human disease.Molecular reproduction and development · 2017Review
- Localized TWIST1 and TWIST2 basic domain substitutions cause four distinct human diseases that can be modeled in Caenorhabditis elegans.Human molecular genetics · 2017Article
- Drosophila and genome-wide association studies: a review and resource for the functional dissection of human complex traits.Disease models & mechanisms · 2017Review
- The Monarch Initiative: an integrative data and analytic platform connecting phenotypes to genotypes across species.Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
- A microRNA-328 binding site in PAX6 is associated with centrotemporal spikes of rolandic epilepsy.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2016Article
- Utilization of information from gene networks towards a better understanding of functional similarities between complex traits: a dairy cattle model.Journal of applied genetics · 2016Article
- Drosophila and experimental neurology in the post-genomic era.Experimental neurology · 2015Review
- Applications of comparative evolution to human disease genetics.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2015Review
- Yeast Phenomics: An Experimental Approach for Modeling Gene Interaction Networks that Buffer Disease.Genes · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhenotypes and diseases may be related to seemingly dissimilar phenotypes in other species by means of the orthology of underlying genes. Such "orthologous phenotypes," or "phenologs," are examples of deep homology, and may be used to predict additional candidate disease genes.
resultsIn this work, we develop an unsupervised algorithm for ranking phenolog-based candidate disease genes through the integration of predictions from the k nearest neighbor phenologs, comparing classifiers and weighting functions by cross-validation. We also improve upon the original method by extending the theory to paralogous phenotypes. Our algorithm makes use of additional phenotype data--from chicken, zebrafish, and E. coli, as well as new datasets for C. elegans--establishing that several types of annotations may be treated as phenotypes. We demonstrate the use of our algorithm to predict novel candidate genes for human atrial fibrillation (such as HRH2, ATP4A, ATP4B, and HOPX) and epilepsy (e.g., PAX6 and NKX2-1). We suggest gene candidates for pharmacologically-induced seizures in mouse, solely based on orthologous phenotypes from E. coli. We also explore the prediction of plant gene-phenotype associations, as for the Arabidopsis response to vernalization phenotype.
conclusionsWe are able to rank gene predictions for a significant portion of the diseases in the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man database. Additionally, our method suggests candidate genes for mammalian seizures based only on bacterial phenotypes and gene orthology. We demonstrate that phenotype information may come from diverse sources, including drug sensitivities, gene ontology biological processes, and in situ hybridization annotations. Finally, we offer testable candidates for a variety of human diseases, plant traits, and other classes of phenotypes across a wide array of species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.